Doc wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:33:33 -0600, "jus lurkin" <juslurkin@home.net>
> wrote:
>
>> LOL, if you mean because being explicit would give away her "little secret"
>> I would say you are right :)
>>
>> <Doc> wrote in message news:9h04u2t485td6fukolshchj5i41qd5t5sf@4ax.com...
>>> Hey, another new comer to the community of models. Somehow I think
>>> this one will remain demure, not explicit. That's fine by me in this
>>> case. What do you think Ohmster?
>
>
> I didn't want to give it away. I wanted to see what others thought
> first. LOL... Although I had the feeling Ohmster wouldn't bite, but
> you never know. Others would for sure. It's a bit of a sport.
I didn't pay enough attention the first time, had to go back and
re-download to see.
The first time I just chalked it up to fugly and moved on. :p
--
-Gandalf
Never meddle in the affairs of a dragon for you are crunchy and taste
good with ketchup!
|
|