Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Gandalf <gandalf@rivendell.bog>
Reply-To: newsgroup
Organization: is a sign of a sick and twisted mind.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: jessica edison 5
References: <YQjEh.30733$p9.9320@bignews7.bellsouth.net> <9h04u2t485td6fukolshchj5i41qd5t5sf@4ax.com> <W8oEh.17970$z6.11376@bigfe9> <1644u2tkksjlis3f17hab3osj72oikla4e@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <1644u2tkksjlis3f17hab3osj72oikla4e@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <B4tEh.17806$ff2.4681@fe02.news.easynews.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:10:09 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:2784
Doc wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:33:33 -0600, "jus lurkin" <juslurkin@home.net>
> wrote:
>
>> LOL, if you mean because being explicit would give away her "little secret"
>> I would say you are right :)
>>
>> <Doc> wrote in message news:9h04u2t485td6fukolshchj5i41qd5t5sf@4ax.com...
>>> Hey, another new comer to the community of models. Somehow I think
>>> this one will remain demure, not explicit. That's fine by me in this
>>> case. What do you think Ohmster?
>
>
> I didn't want to give it away. I wanted to see what others thought
> first. LOL... Although I had the feeling Ohmster wouldn't bite, but
> you never know. Others would for sure. It's a bit of a sport.
I didn't pay enough attention the first time, had to go back and
re-download to see.
The first time I just chalked it up to fugly and moved on. :p
--
-Gandalf
Never meddle in the affairs of a dragon for you are crunchy and taste
good with ketchup!
|
|