LOL :) Really gandalf? I don't think she is that bad looking but I guess to
each his own.....
"Gandalf" <gandalf@rivendell.bog> wrote in message
news:B4tEh.17806$ff2.4681@fe02.news.easynews.com...
> Doc wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:33:33 -0600, "jus lurkin" <juslurkin@home.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> LOL, if you mean because being explicit would give away her "little
>>> secret" I would say you are right :)
>>>
>>> <Doc> wrote in message
>>> news:9h04u2t485td6fukolshchj5i41qd5t5sf@4ax.com...
>>>> Hey, another new comer to the community of models. Somehow I think
>>>> this one will remain demure, not explicit. That's fine by me in this
>>>> case. What do you think Ohmster?
>>
>>
>> I didn't want to give it away. I wanted to see what others thought
>> first. LOL... Although I had the feeling Ohmster wouldn't bite, but
>> you never know. Others would for sure. It's a bit of a sport.
>
> I didn't pay enough attention the first time, had to go back and
> re-download to see.
>
> The first time I just chalked it up to fugly and moved on. :p
>
> --
> -Gandalf
>
> Never meddle in the affairs of a dragon for you are crunchy and taste good
> with ketchup!
|
|