"Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote in message
news:bsop9d$pdg$1@news.onet.pl...
>
> news:bsn2kv$elk73$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > "Constance Vigilant" <anybodyleft@arthurandersen.com> wrote in message
> > news:bsmtie$d0d$0@pita.alt.net...
> > >
> > sniipping
> >
> > > > However, I think your point stands. The simple fact that one delves
> > > > in aquaria does not make one an expert in anything unless that
> > > > expertise is actually shown.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Maybe someone can e-mail him and then he can see this and we'll see if
> he
> > > knows about fish or not.
> >
> > I'm sure he's quite knowlegeable about aquarium catfish. However, I
> don't
> > think you should be looking to Davy for support on anything else. After
> his
> > recent Archaeopteryx/Hoazin debacle, his credibility on anything other
> than
> > catfish is highly in doubt.
> >
> >
> > DJT
> >
> >
>
> How many Archaeopteryx fossils are there again?
At least 5. Why do you ask?
DJT
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 |
|