Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Dana Tweedy" <reddfrogg@NOSPAMlink.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: David Horn's Fish
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:31:56 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
Lines: 41
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <0HYHb.13786$IM3.1168@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>
References: <RZlGb.21052$C87.492@twister.socal.rr.com> <273ab496.0312261008.31f5ae8f@posting.google.com> <Xns945DBCF0B1B50doldridgsprintca@24.69.255.211> <bB7Hb.29390$nG3.8523@twister.socal.rr.com> <pan.2003.12.27.04.44.14.874655@cox.net> <sbeHb.29845$nG3.20648@twister.socal.rr.com> <bsjvae$dut$0@pita.alt.net> <3fedb19d$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsl1so$pud$0@pita.alt.net> <slrnbusk6l.1qo.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem> <35fa3772.0312280651.56c1e8e1@posting.google.com> <bsmtie$d0d$0@pita.alt.net> <bsn2kv$elk73$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de> <bsop9d$pdg$1@news.onet.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1072715516 49648 128.100.83.246 (29 Dec 2003 16:31:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:31:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.40.65.220
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1469
"Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote in message
news:bsop9d$pdg$1@news.onet.pl...
>
> news:bsn2kv$elk73$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > "Constance Vigilant" <anybodyleft@arthurandersen.com> wrote in message
> > news:bsmtie$d0d$0@pita.alt.net...
> > >
> > sniipping
> >
> > > > However, I think your point stands. The simple fact that one delves
> > > > in aquaria does not make one an expert in anything unless that
> > > > expertise is actually shown.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Maybe someone can e-mail him and then he can see this and we'll see if
> he
> > > knows about fish or not.
> >
> > I'm sure he's quite knowlegeable about aquarium catfish. However, I
> don't
> > think you should be looking to Davy for support on anything else. After
> his
> > recent Archaeopteryx/Hoazin debacle, his credibility on anything other
> than
> > catfish is highly in doubt.
> >
> >
> > DJT
> >
> >
>
> How many Archaeopteryx fossils are there again?
At least 5. Why do you ask?
DJT
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 |
|