On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 23:58:19 +0000 (UTC), "Charles C."
<charles_casey@opt_online.net> wrote:
>
>Thank you for putting many of my thoughts into clearer words, at least
>clearer than I could do since this sock puppet has lost all of my
>respect.
No thanks are necessary - I couldn't sit back and watch the eloquent
and insightful post you composed be trampled into the mud, ignored.
Even from the other side of the computer screen, it was possible to
watch you get more and more frustrated as the post went on as you
dredged up painful memories, knowing you probably wouldn't get through
to her. Never fear: *she* might not get it, but hopefully there will
be others who did.
>
>It's amazing what these charlatans will do in order to justify lying
>and deceiving. Not only is that behavior unbecoming of a Christian who
>supposedly is walking with the spirit of God and a book showing that
>this is wrong, but of any human of any belief. How could anyone want
>to pass that type of society on to their children?
The horrible, horrible irony is this: *you* turned away from the
Church and *I* have never been Christian, but she claims to be
confident in her faith and yet we seem more concerned for her immortal
soul than she is...
--
K
Freedom is rarely lost in a single stroke. The danger lies
in losing it bit by bit.
-- Dennis Patrick
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
|