Frank McCoy wrote:
> Well, it shouldn't be. It should be art.
> Hell, with the proper lawyer, likely you could get it ruled that way.
> Not me. They'd assume "prurient interest". ;-{
>
> But if I could, I'd find a cute little girl, get parental permission, and take a
> picture of her sitting and/or standing naked, holding a kitten (preferably cute
> too) with her cunny showing ... not obscenely or sexily, but definitely and
> clearly visible.
>
> And then ... (Wait for it.)
> .
>
> I'd post it to the appropriate newsgroups with the caption:
> "Now ain't that the cutest little pussy you ever saw?
I probably wouldn't even notice the girl, but I love pussy-cats.
--
rgds
LAurence
...What do you mean, QWK? It took over an hour to read!
---*TagZilla 0.059* http://tagzilla.mozdev.org
|
|