Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:28:15 +0000
From: Laurence Taylor <see-headers@nospam.plus.com>
Reply-To: laurence@iapetus.plus.com
Organization: Campaign for Real Time
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.fan.frank.mccoy
Subject: Re: Damn ... If only it wasn't illegal.
References: <m7tjf2hv8ltu0us2b1p4ffp2lngqpb83mi@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <m7tjf2hv8ltu0us2b1p4ffp2lngqpb83mi@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <44fc37fe$0$3202$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net>
X-Comments: ptn-nntp-reader01
NNTP-Posting-Host: 758ee345.ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net
X-Trace: DXC=\fINTmDeU[mW@6TkDZ[O1jigd3Y`7Rb;nYZmCHj47lfe9L860K>k=Xoj0h4k=FdbBoY;EIaNKY4DacPQHn3H07[o
X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.frank.mccoy:891
Frank McCoy wrote:
> Well, it shouldn't be. It should be art.
> Hell, with the proper lawyer, likely you could get it ruled that way.
> Not me. They'd assume "prurient interest". ;-{
>
> But if I could, I'd find a cute little girl, get parental permission, and take a
> picture of her sitting and/or standing naked, holding a kitten (preferably cute
> too) with her cunny showing ... not obscenely or sexily, but definitely and
> clearly visible.
>
> And then ... (Wait for it.)
> .
>
> I'd post it to the appropriate newsgroups with the caption:
> "Now ain't that the cutest little pussy you ever saw?
I probably wouldn't even notice the girl, but I love pussy-cats.
--
rgds
LAurence
...What do you mean, QWK? It took over an hour to read!
---*TagZilla 0.059* http://tagzilla.mozdev.org
|
|