In alt.fan.frank.mccoy Laurence Taylor <see-headers@nospam.plus.com> wrote:
>Frank McCoy wrote:
>> Well, it shouldn't be. It should be art.
>> Hell, with the proper lawyer, likely you could get it ruled that way.
>> Not me. They'd assume "prurient interest". ;-{
>>
>> But if I could, I'd find a cute little girl, get parental permission, and take a
>> picture of her sitting and/or standing naked, holding a kitten (preferably cute
>> too) with her cunny showing ... not obscenely or sexily, but definitely and
>> clearly visible.
>>
>> And then ... (Wait for it.)
>
>> .
>>
>> I'd post it to the appropriate newsgroups with the caption:
>> "Now ain't that the cutest little pussy you ever saw?
>
>I probably wouldn't even notice the girl, but I love pussy-cats.
So do I. I love them both ... But you're missing the whole point!
It isn't the girl *OR* the kitten. It's the pun man, the PUN!
Gesh. Some people have no priorities.
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
|
|