(in article <XnsA442513213CB8roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>):
> lucan <earl@missing.invalid> wrote in
> news:0001HW.D1056923001E37D4B01029BF@news.giganews.com:
>
>> (in article <XnsA44167C4CE2BDroakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>):
>>
>>> news:XnsA44166E9639Droakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131:
>>>
>>>> Hopefully I can post this right.
>>>>
>>>> I know that this csv is not everything, but it did help me sort out
>>>> some problems that I had. For instance, files with altered names:
>>>> "HS-PED~1_ 0" correct name "hs-pedon-100", and "HS-PED~2_0" correct
>>>> name "hs- pedon101".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> One last comment. When looking at this stuff I did not include
>>> indices since they were not integral parts of any post.
>>>
>>> Also, I have nothing on the "Zelig Covers" included in the csv.
>>>
>>> Any opinions would be appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> Here's what gnomon said when he posted this csv:
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> From: gnomon <meton@an.omy>
>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pinups
>> Subject: Re: (ABP) Worthies: Humbert's? 01 of 35 !index file001.jpg
>> 73041Bytes - HumbertsHumbert_864.csv (1/1)
>> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009
>>
>> Here's the csv of Humbert's Humbert's - at least what i have.
>> There are some dupes, but i have not er massaged all the data yet.
>>
>> -gnomon
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> I searched for one of the Zelig Covers and found it in a folder of
>> stuff from the web that Humbert posted. I assume these are all just
>> pics he posted, not his own work.
>>
>> Two Humbert scans not on the csv:
>>
>> bf_vbell 001.jpg (146103)
>> bf_vbell 002.jpg (169292)
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> From: Fawlty@towers.org ( Basil )
>> Subject: New Scans <> Playing with my new Microtek i900 <-- - bf_vbell
>> 001.jpg(1/1) 146103 bytes
>> Organization: Que ?
>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pinups
>> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004
>>
>> Please Don't Cross Post to this NG ...Thank YOU !
>>
>> Awesome scanner . Awesome VBell to break it in
>> correctly !
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> If you don't have them, let me know and I'll repost.
>>
>> lucan
>>
>
>
> I do have the two Virginia Bell files, but they were sitting in a pile of
> miscellaneous pics. I was unaware that they were Humbert scans.
> Thanks for the info.
>
After posting the previous message, it occurred to me that I suppose these
aren't really Humbert Scans, as such. Maybe the 'bf' means 'Basil Fawlty'? I
don't know how collectors usually deal with this. Or if the question ever
arises.
lucan
|
|