Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:33:52 -0600
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:33:52 -0500
From: lucan <earl@missing.invalid>
Organization: seldom
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.D10650C000548024B02919BF@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: <lucan> The csv - 1 attachment
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pinups
X-No-Archive: yes
References: <XnsA44166E9639Droakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131> <XnsA44167C4CE2BDroakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131> <0001HW.D1056923001E37D4B01029BF@news.giganews.com> <XnsA442513213CB8roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>
Lines: 92
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-EtBcAjGrjn/uN0r65fN/4MgB8RCoYH9QCHUcc9J70x0ZdEQ47CqwJX9znXA1jrC9wurf4F3pvEGD3b2!fyBQJ4C0qpMfVi0MEjo2tiZSdArKtY+62Hw4OO7eC8+ykQde8yQyeMDBj8/MG1kY93z0+4ojnhID!ZA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 4157
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1705048042
X-Received-Bytes: 4566
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pinups:714
(in article <XnsA442513213CB8roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>):
> lucan <earl@missing.invalid> wrote in
> news:0001HW.D1056923001E37D4B01029BF@news.giganews.com:
>
>> (in article <XnsA44167C4CE2BDroakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>):
>>
>>> news:XnsA44166E9639Droakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131:
>>>
>>>> Hopefully I can post this right.
>>>>
>>>> I know that this csv is not everything, but it did help me sort out
>>>> some problems that I had. For instance, files with altered names:
>>>> "HS-PED~1_ 0" correct name "hs-pedon-100", and "HS-PED~2_0" correct
>>>> name "hs- pedon101".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> One last comment. When looking at this stuff I did not include
>>> indices since they were not integral parts of any post.
>>>
>>> Also, I have nothing on the "Zelig Covers" included in the csv.
>>>
>>> Any opinions would be appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> Here's what gnomon said when he posted this csv:
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> From: gnomon <meton@an.omy>
>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pinups
>> Subject: Re: (ABP) Worthies: Humbert's? 01 of 35 !index file001.jpg
>> 73041Bytes - HumbertsHumbert_864.csv (1/1)
>> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009
>>
>> Here's the csv of Humbert's Humbert's - at least what i have.
>> There are some dupes, but i have not er massaged all the data yet.
>>
>> -gnomon
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> I searched for one of the Zelig Covers and found it in a folder of
>> stuff from the web that Humbert posted. I assume these are all just
>> pics he posted, not his own work.
>>
>> Two Humbert scans not on the csv:
>>
>> bf_vbell 001.jpg (146103)
>> bf_vbell 002.jpg (169292)
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> From: Fawlty@towers.org ( Basil )
>> Subject: New Scans <> Playing with my new Microtek i900 <-- - bf_vbell
>> 001.jpg(1/1) 146103 bytes
>> Organization: Que ?
>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pinups
>> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004
>>
>> Please Don't Cross Post to this NG ...Thank YOU !
>>
>> Awesome scanner . Awesome VBell to break it in
>> correctly !
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> If you don't have them, let me know and I'll repost.
>>
>> lucan
>>
>
>
> I do have the two Virginia Bell files, but they were sitting in a pile of
> miscellaneous pics. I was unaware that they were Humbert scans.
> Thanks for the info.
>
After posting the previous message, it occurred to me that I suppose these
aren't really Humbert Scans, as such. Maybe the 'bf' means 'Basil Fawlty'? I
don't know how collectors usually deal with this. Or if the question ever
arises.
lucan
|
|