Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Ian Field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-book.technical
References: <n4YWv.570278$rI4.133296@fx33.am4> <h4gXv.529981$AB3.178546@fx07.am4> <0i5s2at6l73qd6bbckr2f15il9m6ttl0l9@4ax.com> <s3CXv.393594$Zu6.129598@fx06.am4> <ohvt2ahjt68hfp335ibk19h4qgt4vnbmug@4ax.com> <0001HW.D054DB3D001C72DCB01029BF@news-europe.giganews.com> <3r8u2a1kug7bja9ivc4a2nv95fck9etiuj@4ax.com> <YzSXv.296731$c33.276947@fx24.fr7> <9n303atdpk648spgoa7r69a9nmkkdd7q7p@4ax.com> <hWcYv.274664$eZ4.163642@fx02.fr7> <56733adel7cii0race2gqfgp9786in34k5@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <56733adel7cii0race2gqfgp9786in34k5@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Tories resent the poor.
Lines: 1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
Message-ID: <nEhYv.434971$Zu6.271616@fx06.am4>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.3.12.46
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: 1412540051 82.3.12.46 (Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:14:11 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:14:11 UTC
Organization: virginmedia.com
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:14:09 +0100
X-Received-Body-CRC: 417943553
X-Received-Bytes: 3842
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-book.technical:425
"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
news:56733adel7cii0race2gqfgp9786in34k5@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 14:51:57 GMT, Moi <moi@here.now> wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>>Why in tech e-book? Easy, they're taking the first falering steps
>>>>towards knowledge. If they search this forum in the past and
>>>>themselves'll find plenty of information to educate theirself.
>>>>
>>>>Anybody who uses phrases like 'socialist vultures' "spending other
>>>>peoples' money" are just advertising their complete ignorance of basic
>>>>socio-economic political philosophy.
>>>>
>>>>Or to put into language that they can understand, they're dumb fucks or
>>>>know nothing about politics - so why should anybody listen when they
>>>>rabbit on about politics.
>>>
>>> Good argument, you disagree with my position so I don't know anything
>>> about politics. Really, is that the very best you can do?
>>>
>>> Saul Alinsky would be proud of you.
>>
>>I can't disagree with your position because you haven't presented one,
>>merely a sentence deenigrating a position thqat you are ignorant of.
>>
>>Have you ever seen the IT Crowd? The one where the woman who is totally
>>ignorany of IT repeats what her staff have told her, in a managers
>>meeting, that if you type 'google' into google you will 'break the
>>internet'. She was just displaying her ignorance of what she was talking
>>about.
>>
>>If you knew anything about basic socio-economic political theory (I
>>include capitalism in this heading) you wouldn't use such terms, you'd be
>>in a position to present an informed opinion.
>>
>>Comments such as 'socialist vultures' and 'spending other peoples' money'
>>are the equivalent to "if you type 'google' into google you'll break the
>>internet.
>
> I have been giving your comments some consideration. You are right about
> one
> thing, socialists are not carrion scavengers. Socialists are worse than
> scavengers, they are parasites, more closely related to ticks, fleas and
> tapeworms.
>
> At least vultures do the work of finding an organism which is finished
> using
> it's assets.
In the UK; we have the Toraidhe, who decide that publicly owned assets
actually belong to them while they're in government - and sell them off to
foreign investors.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|