On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:14:09 +0100, "Ian Field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>
>
>"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
>news:56733adel7cii0race2gqfgp9786in34k5@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 14:51:57 GMT, Moi <moi@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Why in tech e-book? Easy, they're taking the first falering steps
>>>>>towards knowledge. If they search this forum in the past and
>>>>>themselves'll find plenty of information to educate theirself.
>>>>>
>>>>>Anybody who uses phrases like 'socialist vultures' "spending other
>>>>>peoples' money" are just advertising their complete ignorance of basic
>>>>>socio-economic political philosophy.
>>>>>
>>>>>Or to put into language that they can understand, they're dumb fucks or
>>>>>know nothing about politics - so why should anybody listen when they
>>>>>rabbit on about politics.
>>>>
>>>> Good argument, you disagree with my position so I don't know anything
>>>> about politics. Really, is that the very best you can do?
>>>>
>>>> Saul Alinsky would be proud of you.
>>>
>>>I can't disagree with your position because you haven't presented one,
>>>merely a sentence deenigrating a position thqat you are ignorant of.
>>>
>>>Have you ever seen the IT Crowd? The one where the woman who is totally
>>>ignorany of IT repeats what her staff have told her, in a managers
>>>meeting, that if you type 'google' into google you will 'break the
>>>internet'. She was just displaying her ignorance of what she was talking
>>>about.
>>>
>>>If you knew anything about basic socio-economic political theory (I
>>>include capitalism in this heading) you wouldn't use such terms, you'd be
>>>in a position to present an informed opinion.
>>>
>>>Comments such as 'socialist vultures' and 'spending other peoples' money'
>>>are the equivalent to "if you type 'google' into google you'll break the
>>>internet.
>>
>> I have been giving your comments some consideration. You are right about
>> one
>> thing, socialists are not carrion scavengers. Socialists are worse than
>> scavengers, they are parasites, more closely related to ticks, fleas and
>> tapeworms.
>>
>> At least vultures do the work of finding an organism which is finished
>> using
>> it's assets.
>
>In the UK; we have the Toraidhe, who decide that publicly owned assets
>actually belong to them while they're in government - and sell them off to
>foreign investors.
It is quite apparent you do not like the conservative party in the UK.
If someone has done something illegal, they should be prosecuted. On the other
hand, if you simply disagree with their policies, vote them out of office.
If you can't vote them out of office, well, you are shit-out-of-luck.
By the way, exactly what "publicly owned assets" were sold off inappropriately?
The government in the USA doesn't do such things, we simply borrow more money,
increase our national debt to $18 trillion and give the money away to every
country and or individual with some bullshit story.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|