On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 14:51:57 GMT, Moi <moi@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>Why in tech e-book? Easy, they're taking the first falering steps
>>>towards knowledge. If they search this forum in the past and
>>>themselves'll find plenty of information to educate theirself.
>>>
>>>Anybody who uses phrases like 'socialist vultures' "spending other
>>>peoples' money" are just advertising their complete ignorance of basic
>>>socio-economic political philosophy.
>>>
>>>Or to put into language that they can understand, they're dumb fucks or
>>>know nothing about politics - so why should anybody listen when they
>>>rabbit on about politics.
>>
>> Good argument, you disagree with my position so I don't know anything
>> about politics. Really, is that the very best you can do?
>>
>> Saul Alinsky would be proud of you.
>
>I can't disagree with your position because you haven't presented one,
>merely a sentence deenigrating a position thqat you are ignorant of.
>
>Have you ever seen the IT Crowd? The one where the woman who is totally
>ignorany of IT repeats what her staff have told her, in a managers
>meeting, that if you type 'google' into google you will 'break the
>internet'. She was just displaying her ignorance of what she was talking
>about.
>
>If you knew anything about basic socio-economic political theory (I
>include capitalism in this heading) you wouldn't use such terms, you'd be
>in a position to present an informed opinion.
>
>Comments such as 'socialist vultures' and 'spending other peoples' money'
>are the equivalent to "if you type 'google' into google you'll break the
>internet.
I have been giving your comments some consideration. You are right about one
thing, socialists are not carrion scavengers. Socialists are worse than
scavengers, they are parasites, more closely related to ticks, fleas and
tapeworms.
At least vultures do the work of finding an organism which is finished using
it's assets. Parasites, a.k.a. socialists, do no work, they invade any thriving
organism, siphoning off life sustaining nutrients rendering the host frail,
diseased or at the very least, worse off than it would have been without the
parasite, a.k.a. socialist.
Yes, socialists are parasites and should be treated as such.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|