On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:57:48 GMT, Gandalf <gandalf@rivendel.bog>
wrote:
>DOC wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 03:36:26 GMT, Gandalf@Rivendel.bog wrote:
>>
>> It's great to see a fresh looking, clean babe by a pretty good and
>> perverted photographer.
>>
>
>Agreed. Although an upskirt or twenty would have been nice, but I still
>thought it to be a good set.
>
>That style of hose takes me back to when I first developed the fetish.
>And those knees...God, I love those knees. :-)
>
>Course, it helps that she's basically cute and tattoo free.
>I'm so sick of the 'net skanks that are so prevelant these days.
>
>-Gandalf
Well that's what I was talking about, the basic cuteness and lack of
signs of degenerate modern bimboism. I'm just sick of it. No. I'm
not like doctrinaire and reject any girls with tattoos, i don't. But
that's a factor as well as just the basic look/feel of the girl
whether she she looks used/abused or not etc. I'd prefer no tats but
I'm not rigid about it if they aren't too freaking big and she is
otherwise fine. Doc
|
|
 116200 bytes')){kind=link}