Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: DOC <docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com>
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: karolina57.jpg(1/1) 116200 bytes
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:53:09 -0400
Message-ID: <5sd5f19kr83eap3006k6rg96bl7atj551f@4ax.com>
References: <_2gIe.923433$JR4.842188@fe02.news.easynews.com> <h993f15mecf7tuh2l4nui6shvk3bqmamig@4ax.com> <L3xIe.838497$ub.832296@fe07.news.easynews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 28
Organization: Unknown
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shared-secrets.com
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:783
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:57:48 GMT, Gandalf <gandalf@rivendel.bog>
wrote:
>DOC wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 03:36:26 GMT, Gandalf@Rivendel.bog wrote:
>>
>> It's great to see a fresh looking, clean babe by a pretty good and
>> perverted photographer.
>>
>
>Agreed. Although an upskirt or twenty would have been nice, but I still
>thought it to be a good set.
>
>That style of hose takes me back to when I first developed the fetish.
>And those knees...God, I love those knees. :-)
>
>Course, it helps that she's basically cute and tattoo free.
>I'm so sick of the 'net skanks that are so prevelant these days.
>
>-Gandalf
Well that's what I was talking about, the basic cuteness and lack of
signs of degenerate modern bimboism. I'm just sick of it. No. I'm
not like doctrinaire and reject any girls with tattoos, i don't. But
that's a factor as well as just the basic look/feel of the girl
whether she she looks used/abused or not etc. I'd prefer no tats but
I'm not rigid about it if they aren't too freaking big and she is
otherwise fine. Doc
|
|
 116200 bytes')){kind=link}