DVD/DC
You have a slim grasp of the truth and reality as you display every time
you try to divert attention from yourself.
I think you are the last person to talk about liars....
DC - may have a prettier mouth than a $5 dollar whore - but I'm unsure
what point he was trying to make - other than he can post longer and
more irrelevant replies (even) than mine.. (no salt on the fries DC)
The subject has never been changed by me....
I still say you are spamming the group and use it only to advertise your
business.
I won't start a tirade which begins .... I know your type you are a
.....
because we all know that that is just a tactic to obscure the main issue
and to introduce irrelevant crap which doesn't need proof or foundation.
I'll repeat my point for the benefit of you and DC seeing that neither
of you seem unable to grasp what it is.
You are spamming the group by using it exclusively to advertise your
business
plain enough now?
In most justice systems around the world (excluding perhaps Gadaffi,
Pol-Pot and the like) there is generally more priority given to proving
or disproving an allegation i.e. "YOU dvd are a spammer who advertises
his business in this and other groups".
>>>I doubt seriously he has a lot of friends or social contacts in the
real world.
(In reality I'd have thought that the "regulars" were the real social
outcasts ...
They certainly seem to have an abundance of spare time and it's
difficult to surf when you're visiting friends (or so I find)).
I can't remember when I saw "Serial killer acquitted because he has some
nice friends, writes very nice letters and a divine wardrobe!!"
in the news. (maybe in wayne state?)
Just as you are finding - Its difficult to prove your popularity
especially in the groups - (is it 4 or 5 now - including yourself?)
The size of your social circle, or the size of your pay packet is surely
irrelevant here
(or are you trying to introduce a class system? .... actually from what
you've said I think you are)
surely the statement "I count more than anyone else" is a statement of
your estimation of your worth?
>>>watch us all fall in awe.
It certainly seems to irk you more that I DARE to question one of your
standing rather than WHAT I'm questioning.
The only criterion I imagine the majority use here is the number and
quality of a person's posts.
For most, to prove if they own a business or are unemployed is
impossible in an environment which is almost exclusively anonymous.
For you however that's the easy one ... you prove that your business
exists with every post you make.
Prove to the group (not me) that you are worth a second glance.
Show that I'm wrong - and not by criticising my writing style, IQ or the
colour of my shirt.
DC could help you - he's published - and debated at Wayne State (is that
"at" or "with" wayne?). - so he's the genius ... not me.
His impeccable syntax should ensure a humiliating victory over me
It should be easy .....
I promise the whole group that I'll vanish as soon as you do.
However little you rate them .... they're the ones.
ac
DVD Doc wrote:
> You just lied again. Your first post complained it was off topic as
> it was a head shot. You are a time waster seeking to shift to a new
> argument as you lose them.
>
> Troll, liar, time waster = ac.
|
|
 - ad nausium> Tyler O' returns in reinf. toe - Ty504phf14d.jpg')){kind=link}