succinctly put
ac
DC wrote:
> DVD Doc <docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com> wrote in
> news:5tr171pv18nv2uc2uit6slpedsq9flpqh1@4ax.com:
>
> > You just lied again. Your first post complained it was off topic as
> > it was a head shot. You are a time waster seeking to shift to a new
> > argument as you lose them.
> >
> > Troll, liar, time waster = ac.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Ya know Doc? I think we've all known someone, or if truly unfortunate,
> several individuals similar to AC.
>
> He likes to think of himself as truly wise, an intellectual, and is pompous
> to the extent that he believes everything he says is entirely profound, and
> must be heard by all those around him.
>
> He is of no consequence to the group, and although I've not been around as
> long as you have, I have been here since '98, which I suppose is longer
> than most. Like you, I've not heard of this twit, nor do I remember any
> "ac" any longer ago than the last couple months or so.
>
> His attitude is to come into this group,or any other group of people he
> encounters, impress us with his wisdom and intellectual points, and watch
> us all fall in awe of his words; or at least allow him the floor, so to
> speak.
>
> The problem is that the only one that believes he's a critical thinker, a
> philosopher, a wise man, and highly intelligent, is himself.
>
> I remember his first tirade where he used incredibly tired and worn out
> cliche's toward this group in an attempt to bull shit us into thinking he
> really had something to say.
>
> He does not.
>
> I debated at Wayne State, I am pubished, and although I'm not an English
> Major (You want fries with that...) I do know my way around the English
> language. I know what he is attempting, but he doesn't have the tools to
> pull it off. When he does have something original to say, it's wrapped
> around a syntax style he is not competent in.
>
> In other words, he's boorish, makes entirely too much unnecessary and
> unwanted noise, and is truly insignificant. Whether he realizes that and
> it's killing him, or he lacks the foresight to see this and really believes
> he has something to offer, we cannot know.
>
> Think of the pretext here. The guy shows up. Sticks around long enough to
> learn a few people, then comes up with some bizarre commentary that he not
> only conveys, but then editorializes!
>
> The pay off for him is only that we reply. That's all he wants. The topic
> is not only secondary and spurious, but it doesn't even mean anything to
> him --other than a vehicle to have the floor.
>
> Why do you think he changes the subject so often?
>
> If I knew this guy personally, after several "shut the fuck up you unaware
> insignificant" comments, he may get the idea. However, we don't have that
> luxury here.
>
> My suggestion is to simply ignore him. I blew the guy off after his first
> tirade. Without an audience he will simply fade away.
>
> We can alrady glean a few things from his past behaviour and comments. I
> doubt seriously he has a lot of friends or social contacts in the real
> world. His reality is entirely created in his head and is infested with
> fantasy. His "quest" (his word, not mine) is to find a group of hero
> worshippers that believe him to be both perceptive and profound.
>
> If we chose not to play, he'll pick up his toys and go elsewhere.
|
|
 - ad nausium> Tyler O' returns in reinf. toe - Ty504phf14d.jpg')){kind=link}