G & D
So you kept my letters? --- I'm impressed for someone with a "life" you seem to spend
most of your time (and disc space?) archiving what is, by your definition crap ......
tell me did you print them out and tie them with ribbons?
Gand my day job is my business - I don't own it - I'm one of three partners (look
back).
This is good - now that doc has you at his side (sadly he seems unable to defend his
own corner) - the insults come thick and fast - shame that there is no logic or
reasoning behind any of it .... just lots of noise and insults.....
I guess hoping that that will be enough to divert attention from the real issue.
>>>No "answers" work for annoying trolls
How would you know DVD? - you've never give a straight answer to anything.
If a question is uncomfortable for you you just say "I don't have to - I'm a regular"
Well I think that you have made your position clear "king doc" along with your
faithful archivist gandalf
(lol - how anal do you have to be to keep posts from November?).
I just wonder if you'll ever again post anything that's not promoting your business.
Y' know that's why the group exists.
It relies on posts to keep it alive - not stories about you wrestling with trannies
and chicks with dicks 10 years ago.
I promise to stop, if you contribute as much as sam for a single month.
but I suppose you won't - you are after all a regular.
(that must be a regular advertiser - 'cause it sure as hell isn't a regular
contributor).
(You're right about one thing - "my imaginary job" sometimes requires that I do some
night work - and well your brand of hypocrisy is predictable, amusing and passes a
few hours - It breaks the boredom).
Prove me wrong DVD - that's all I ask - prove me wrong. - don't just throw stones
The whole group is waiting for you to kill the troll.
Smite me with a regular (not spam) post of epic proportions
(geez even gandalf has contributed 3 series since last October).
All hail the regulars - where would we be without you two?
DVD Doc wrote:
> From On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 00:40:16 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >This is a pretty serious mistake - you put yourself forward as an expert, having
> >seriously derided people for not knowing about all the options, and then in your
> >capacity as a consultant you mis-advise your client - to use a piece of software
> >based on it's cost .... which in fact will not do the job you say it will for
> >the price you quote.
> >
> >Having taken your advice, your client is then put in the position of either
> >having to make time consuming modifications to his system configuration - or to
> >incur extra outlay on the purchase of extra licenses to rectify your oversight.
> >
> >Believe me - this is my day job - if I had done this to one of my clients - you
> >would be talking serious compensation. The last software upgrade I oversaw cost
> >recover the mistake, added on to that would have been compensation for the
> >firm's loss of revenue as well as paying penalties for not completing the work
> >on time. Add to that the fact that I would probably never have worked again.
> >
> >I think that rather than banging on about R&VK's shortcomings and how none of it
> >is your fault
>
> Criticizes someone else for putting themselves as an "expert", then
> says "believe me" and huffs and puffs out his own phony credentials
> all the while defending R&VK (r.i.p. @aol.com). Just read and listen
> to the tone of the fool that came in here and immediately went to work
> engaging himself in months long flame wars. He sticks like dog-shit
> to a shoe.
>
> Feeding everyone bullshit about his "day job" but the humorous part
> that struck me at the time was wondering how could anyone stand to
> work with an obnoxious fool like that anywhere. Maybe he works with R
> and VK?
|
|