From On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 00:40:16 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>This is a pretty serious mistake - you put yourself forward as an expert, having
>seriously derided people for not knowing about all the options, and then in your
>capacity as a consultant you mis-advise your client - to use a piece of software
>based on it's cost .... which in fact will not do the job you say it will for
>the price you quote.
>
>Having taken your advice, your client is then put in the position of either
>having to make time consuming modifications to his system configuration - or to
>incur extra outlay on the purchase of extra licenses to rectify your oversight.
>
>Believe me - this is my day job - if I had done this to one of my clients - you
>would be talking serious compensation. The last software upgrade I oversaw cost
>recover the mistake, added on to that would have been compensation for the
>firm's loss of revenue as well as paying penalties for not completing the work
>on time. Add to that the fact that I would probably never have worked again.
>
>I think that rather than banging on about R&VK's shortcomings and how none of it
>is your fault
Criticizes someone else for putting themselves as an "expert", then
says "believe me" and huffs and puffs out his own phony credentials
all the while defending R&VK (r.i.p. @aol.com). Just read and listen
to the tone of the fool that came in here and immediately went to work
engaging himself in months long flame wars. He sticks like dog-shit
to a shoe.
Feeding everyone bullshit about his "day job" but the humorous part
that struck me at the time was wondering how could anyone stand to
work with an obnoxious fool like that anywhere. Maybe he works with R
and VK?
|
|