In article <170420191600180790%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> In article <atropos-2FDCA6.08574617042019@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <super70s-4b52A0.02094017042019@reader01.eternal-september.org>,
> > super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > A 40-year-old Indiana man is suing his parents in federal court for
> > > destroying his gargantuan collection of pornography, the value of
> > > which he placed at $30,000.
> > >
> > > In the interest of privacy, The Daily Caller News Foundation has
> > > chosen not to publish the lawsuit itself, or identify those involved.
> >
> > It's a lawsuit. It's public record. Stop being stupid.
> The son has been identified here and there as "Charlie," in quotes. No
> outlet has the text of the lawsuit or the true names of the parties
> involved, as these details have not been released, much less published
> by anyone.
The article says he filed suit in federal court. All federal court
filings are available on PACER. All media organizations have PACER
accounts. They could easily just log on, bring up the filing and the
plaintiff's name would be there at the top of page one.
|
|