Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Is it legal to masturbate to Dakota Fanning's rape scene in Hounddog?
From: lamegrrl@hotmail.com (Tits McGee)
Organization: Tits McGee
Message-ID: <20070201095419.899$aP@newsreader.com>
Newsgroups: alt.masturbation
References: <1169782668.366646.189320@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <20070126090956.622$BZ@newsreader.com> <Xns98C47800BF4F6vjkclzx@207.115.17.102> <20070126140519.621$Iu@newsreader.com> <1170188133.626315.121250@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> <20070130195555.607$FR@newsreader.com> <1170263637.944930.296360@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <20070131140935.796$Nh@newsreader.com> <1170339918.193533.143020@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
X-NRC-Trace: NewsReader.Com co@Idd1FJE3sVlObp3NDCwXPH09UoYbLRCF.YL@XCN6Aieb7
Date: 01 Feb 2007 14:52:03 GMT
Lines: 47
NNTP-Posting-Host: da981a11.nr3.newsreader.com
X-Trace: DXC=mVLc5VHm=3edDi\hZ=5TAeOA8_@f\K_ibmCe^_jV>WBheh8Y;7e8hSiiJ;iV2YAoGe4;efCCYXYGe5V\6\0i=?on
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsreader.com
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.masturbation:1220
jlrisdon@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jan 31, 3:07 pm, lameg...@hotmail.com (Tits McGee) wrote:
> > "onan_42" <onan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > OK, name ONE. Just one statute that says masturbation (not public
> > > > masturbation, but plan old vanilla, in your own house,
> > > > mastubation.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > It's against the state law in Texas to use a sex toy on yourself or
> > > others.(you can own one you just can't use it). no dildos, sybians,
> > > no Fleslights or Cyberskins. Sale of sex toys is prohobitited unless
> > > they are sold as "novelty" items. The same people who wrote this law
> > > would probably outlaw masturbation altogether if they could find out
> > > a way to police it.
> >
> > > Onan
> >
> > But that it a law against sex toys, not masturbation. Maybe they want
> > to outlaw it, but it ISN'T against the law.
>
> So, to recap the conversation.
>
> Demand: Name one law that says masturbation is illegal.
>
> Response: Here's one.
>
> Objection! That doesn't qualify .. . because .... because .... oh,
> yeah, because I said so.
Are you retarded? That is like saying that a law against condoms is a law
against sex or a law against child pornography is a law against using a
computer. Do you not know the difference between an ACT and an OBJECT? I
feel sorry for your wife if she says "lets have sex" and you hand her a
condom and walk away! On the other hand, maybe I shouldn't feel sorry if
that is what you do.
> (Right. You never know, there could be a myrid of reasons why someone
> would use a sex toy on themselves other than masturbation. Good point.)
Name a law against masturbation. Not a law against something you use to
masturbate. Masturbation is an ACT. A sex toy is an OJECT. Sex toys can
be used during SEX (imagine that! Oh, I bet you don't have an imagination,
though, do you?). Some sex toys can ALSO be used for massages. On the
other hand, you can use your hand, or a pillow, or the faucet in your bath
tub to masturbate. I didn't ask about a law that outlaws an object, but a
law that outlaws an act. So, NAME IT!
|
|