Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b32!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!news.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.news2me.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news.alt.net
From: Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: A Stunning Concession!
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 22:16:29 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: UTB
Lines: 74
Message-ID: <Xns9AAB54CD8E9F9utb@208.90.168.18>
References: <ge8b34la5n9cqp8p3vrt8b49ckrl4grsgv@4ax.com> <Xns9AA75F2888BC1utb@208.90.168.18> <v20c34hgugp2fmf0nninrd66athp0boq5q@4ax.com> <Xns9AA762BB82346utb@208.90.168.18> <7a8c34p6v1ebuqcml98t2p7p2l13hpfdbq@4ax.com> <g1629u$gi7$1@news.mixmin.net> <part1of1.1.vl9878Zn105qZQ@ue.ph>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:1556
X-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:31:26 UTC (s02-b32)
white-magic <white-magic@remailed-it.com> wrote in
news:part1of1.1.vl9878Zn105qZQ@ue.ph:
> flopiness_dissimilated@hhhh.com wrote:
>>Whenever cornered on an actual point, such as any one of the myriad
>>contradictions
>>in the unyielding wall of antipedo discourse, they always just ignore it
>>and attack on another front. Children can give informed consent to
>>something? Of course they can, they are expected to on all sorts of
>>serious matters, such as whether to risk life and limb playing extremely
>>dangerous full contact sports (Ted could tell us about the lifelong
>>injuries sustained by playing Australian football, for example, but
>>gridiron and rugby are probably almost as bad). Then there's
>>skateboards and climbing trees. More children are crippled or killed
>>every year through those activities (not to mention psychological trauma
>>of hospitalization and rehab) than anyone would dare acknowledge. There
>>is extreme social pressure for boys to play dangerous sports, much iof
>>it from those who are supposed to protect them. But they give their
>>consent to play, usually enjoy it too.
>>
>>Are we sure they understand the risks of dangerous sports? No, but we
>>really don't care. We feel the benefits of team sports outweigh the
>>risks, though they really do not in many cases.
>>
>>Do we understand the alleged risks of children being photographed naked?
>>What risks? Oh, that's right, YOU might make them feel ashamed, for
>>what, having bodies? And then there's the catchall (another hallmark)
>>'they're being exploited!".
>>I know it is a waste of time typing anything in response to these
>>bastards, because they are not interested (or even capabale) of
>>examining the actual basis of their own position. They just believe
>>they are right. As I said, when cornered, they just deflect and come in
>>on another line of attack. It is extremely threatening to them, to the
>>core, to even contemplate that they might be wrong on any of their
>>doctrinaire bollocks. I have experienced this also in trying to discuss
>>the whole antipedo paranoid pogrom with ordinary folk out there in the
>>world.. Even if intellectually they know I am right on these points,
>>the programming goes so deep that at some point they just can't take it,
>>and we're back to no grey areas. Black and white.
>>
>>Yet we are the ones who are supposed to be mired in "cognitive
>>distortion" (what they say you are doing when you disagree with them)
>>and "a wall of defences". The shoe fits just as well on the other foot.
>>
>>You're all body-hating, ideologically driven, bastards. Get fucked the
>>lot of you.
>
> I believe that this people who, so viscerally, are against boylovers
> have spent many years without contact with children and in addition have
> completely forgotten his childhood years.
> If my own experience says something it's that boys are exhibitionists by
> nature. Every summer, in the last eight years, I take to my own sons and
> a handful of friends of his age to camping in beaches, rivers or lakes.
> No one of us, by raising or by environment, are nudist, nevertheless
> systematically, since they was 7 years old until now that they have 15,
> they enjoyed each opportunity to free themselves of their clothes and to
> run or swim without textile impediments. They DEMAND be photographed on
> the nude and even turn those brief photographic sessions into joyful
> celebrations. Never, throughout the passage of the years, no one of them
> has been shamed or has asked to me to erase the photographs and videos
> of our excursions. By the contrary, sometimes they ask to review the
> images of previous years and they enjoy them. Let me to clarify that the
> images of they naked, although are, certainly, those that more laughter
> and commentaries provoke, are only an integral part of the avalanche of
> memories of the good time that they had. In summary: nobody is shaming,
> abusing or inflicting psychological wounds to these kids, only giving
> them the opportunity of some happy moments in their lives.
Which is fine. But they don't expect their pics to end up on Usenet for
pedophiles to masturbate over, do they?
--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|