news:beh2pv.b8.1@zbihniew.news...
> > From what I've found so far, Chinese.
>
> I guess Esperanto is easier for many of us as it's Indo-European. However,
> the universal language is not to be only for Indo-European-speaker
> (althought they are the biggest group, living in Europe and both
Americas).
> If Chinese is really so simple, I will try to learn it. However, I don't
> like the idea of their alphabet. I think it would be easier combined with
> Roman alphabet and some special diactrics.
Zbihu, Chinese grammar is 'simple' to make up for the other complications.
Uncle Davey
|
|