Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: my thoughts on universal language
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:58:46 +0200
Organization: Tadex Niejadex
Lines: 18
Sender: piorokrat@autograf.pl@qq185.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
Message-ID: <begsi0$d8b$1@news.onet.pl>
References: <befg54.co.1@zbihniew.news> <3F0C6877.7291@alphalink.com.au> <GXLOa.70510$ic1.1298062@twister.tampabay.rr.com> <209ngv4edof89p4eo03kdui00uvmmpliv3@4ax.com> <beh2pv.b8.1@zbihniew.news>
NNTP-Posting-Host: qq185.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
X-Trace: news.onet.pl 1057748352 13579 80.50.236.185 (9 Jul 2003 10:59:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@onet.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jul 2003 10:59:12 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:4
news:beh2pv.b8.1@zbihniew.news...
> > From what I've found so far, Chinese.
>
> I guess Esperanto is easier for many of us as it's Indo-European. However,
> the universal language is not to be only for Indo-European-speaker
> (althought they are the biggest group, living in Europe and both
Americas).
> If Chinese is really so simple, I will try to learn it. However, I don't
> like the idea of their alphabet. I think it would be easier combined with
> Roman alphabet and some special diactrics.
Zbihu, Chinese grammar is 'simple' to make up for the other complications.
Uncle Davey
|
|