"David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105210030.426997.192150@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Uncle Davey wrote:
> > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1105209099.811014.131450@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:1105207851.175319.50260@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:1105205815.160267.232260@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > > > > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > >
> news:1105204419.211306.139790@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > news:1105184699.127650.138520@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > < snip >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > "But it's goin' to take some time this time
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > And I can't make demands
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > But like the young trees in the wintertime
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'll learn how to bend
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Looks like a copyright violation to me, Davey
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm happy to refund their lost income.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Do you really think that's the point, Davey?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > By the way, it was MY mistake, as it turns
> out.
> > > > > Mark
> > > > > > > has
> > > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > reading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here, at least lately.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't sweat it, dude. I still love ya.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm straight, Davey, but thanks, anyway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Go ahead and glue your lips back to Jason's
> ass,
> > > where
> > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > belong.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Just painting me as a sycophant again.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I don't need to paint you that way, Davey.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You did that all on your own.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm about as much a sycophant as Niemoeller was
> for
> > > > > sticking
> > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > > > > groups before he was the only one left.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Don't short-change yourself, Davey.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your an infinitely greater sycophant than THAT.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For one thing, no one with an ounce of sense would
> > > consider
> > > > > > > > > Niemoeller
> > > > > > > > > > > to be a sycophant.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For another - Jason is not a put-upon victim here.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > He jolly well is.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No, he jolly well isn't.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You've chased him all over the net when he wasn't
> even
> > > > > > > > > > posting here.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Well, for one thing, I didn't chanse him "all over the
> > > net."
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It's a big net, Davey.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And there's more than just me.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Secondly, he DID post; and he was quite vocal.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Furthermore, he continued to behave badly in other
> places
> > > on
> > > > > "the
> > > > > > > net,"
> > > > > > > > > including his own web pages.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jason makes victims of others, and he gets responses.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If he didn't do those things, he wouldn't have anything
> to
> > > > > worry
> > > > > > > about.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Saying that Jason is a victim is like saying David
> Koresh
> > > and
> > > > > Jim
> > > > > > > Jones
> > > > > > > > > were victims.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Whatever.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wow!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Did THAT come out of your "toolbox," Davey?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Now that I know you're just trolling, it doesn't amount
> to
> > > such a
> > > > > > > > hill of beans.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh, I'm doing a bit more than trolling, Davey.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Trolling is as trolling does. Yours spills over to RL, but
> > > trolling's
> > > > > what
> > > > > > it is, at base.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, as I understand it, Usenet parlance is that a "troll"
> enters
> > > > > material into newsgroups with no desire to discuss the issues
> > > raised in
> > > > > that material.
> > > > >
> > > > > They usually don't take part in subsequent discussion, debate
> or
> > > > > argument.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm right here, Davey.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's what it REALLY is, Davey:
> > > > >
> > > > > We've built up a pretty good case showing that Jason Gastrich
> is
> > > > > something other than what he represents, and that's putting it
> > > kindly.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And you have been making a fool of yourself on his behalf for
> far
> > > too
> > > > > long.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, I suspect that all of this talk of trolling and the
> earlier
> > > talk
> > > > > of a New Year's resolution is your way to try to withdraw from
> the
> > > > > issues rather than face them.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's fine, Davey. That's your right.
> > > > >
> > > > > But my take is that you've been found to be wrong on so many
> things
> > > in
> > > > > these threads, that it might be best to dismiss me as a "troll"
> and
> > > > > walk away.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think that will be too convincing, Davey.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not walking away, even though you are a troll.
> > >
> > > Because YOU say so?
> > >
> > > Tish, tosh, Davey.
> > >
> > > > You still need salvation.
> > >
> > > No, I don't.
> > >
> > > > I'm here for you, if you need a Christian, to talk to.
> > >
> > > Now why would I need a christian to talk to?
> > >
> > > I probably know more about the history and origins of the religion
> than
> > > most, after all.
> > >
> > > And while I can personally respect a person who sincerely believes
> in
> > > the balderdash that is what we commonly understand as
> "christianity,"
> > > it is no less balderdash for that reason.
> > >
> > > You should never presume that my general respect for the beliefs of
> > > others means that I am amenable to those beliefs or will accept
> them.
> >
> > Well in that case I'm here for you anyway.
> You need me more than I need you, Davey.
>
> I help keep you honest.
There is that.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 |
|