Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: frank.pericope@oneimage.com (Frank Pericope)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Position statement - Frank Pericope was no better than Ninure'speriscope.
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:12:08 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 103
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <dc55e47f.0404140413.f1dd8d4@posting.google.com>
References: <c58g9k$nck$0@pita.alt.net> <c5c5oi$kb$0@pita.alt.net> <Wphec.8637$BR1.5879@okepread03> <c5c9uh$cfl$0@pita.alt.net> <glennsheldon-Pkkec.583$Fa2.52972@news.uswest.net> <dc55e47f.0404120652.5ca7a6fc@posting.google.com> <glennsheldon-a6Aec.17$aV.40812@news.uswest.net> <c5f6co$qh9$0@pita.alt.net> <35fa3772.0404122314.54b793ca@posting.google.com> <c5gdok$5i3$0@pita.alt.net> <407bdc73_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <dc55e47f.0404130955.7901ede0@posting.google.com> <c5hcs6$et7$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1081944728 66204 128.100.83.246 (14 Apr 2004 12:12:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:12:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.108.121.5
X-Spamscanner: mailbox10.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Mar 10 2004 15:18:19, 0.0/5.0 2.63)
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 69355 i3ECDk4F087528 mailbox10.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3524
"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message news:<c5hcs6$et7$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > "\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
> news:<407bdc73_4@corp.newsgroups.com>...
> > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > news:<c5f6co$qh9$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > > >
> > <snip Davey's "evidence" for brevity>
> >
> > > > This is as good as the evidence that had me pegged as Constance
> Vigilant. I
> > > > made the blunder of not coughing at that stage and brazening it out.
> Very
> > > > bad of me, never again. I don't advise Ninure to put off coughing
> until the
> > > > chunk of credibility I lost then flies out of her window too.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > It occurs to me that my previous post in reply to Davey's false
> > assertions failed to point out that the evidence that brought the CV
> > sock-puppet to light wasn't the coincidence of his postsing behavior;
> > that was only supporting evidence. What brought it to light, as Davey
> > seems conveniently to have forgotten, was signing one of his
> > puppet-posts in his own name.
>
> You have a very good memory. Clearly you are no newbie here, so tell me, if
> you want to go for a Usenet suicide pact with me, including all shell
> enities, who is your mother ship?
I do have a good memory, but on Google's version of Usenet it's really
not necessary. To your point: I've lurked here since the middle of
last year.
>
> Who were you before March 8, 2004?
Myself. Beginning March 2. Before that, no one.
>
> Who were you, while all that 'constant vigilance' was going on?
>
A lurker.
> >
> > Davey, on the other hand, digs for coincidence not as supporting
> > evidence, but as his only evidence.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Quit blaiming others for your troubles, Davey. Grow up enough to accept
> > > responsibility for your own actions. Quit being a whiney crybaby.
> > >
> > > Pathetic loser.
> >
> > <snip LF's sig for brevity and clarity, sorry>
> >
> > I will repeat a number of simple, declarative, and unequivocal
> > statements:
> >
> > I am not a sock-puppet.
> > I have never run a sock-puppet.
> > I have no connection to Ninure
> > Saunders/RainbowChristiannohate@hotmail.com
> >
> > Can I make that any more clear?
> >
> > I assert, with certainty, that no one can or will find any legitimate
> > evidence to support Davey's charge that will be anything other than
> > purely coincidental evidence. That certainty is based not on any
> > presumed detection evasion skills, but on knowledge of the simple
> > truth, as declared above.
> >
> > I understand that readers have only my word for it, and that some who
> > disagree with my opinions will choose therefore to presume my word is
> > not good. I can do little if anything to dissuade them.
> >
> > But any who are sincerely uncertain might look to my posts; look to
> > their honesty, self-consistency, and clear intent, which were and are
> > the best I can muster. Compare them to my accuser's posting history.
> >
> > Then judge, if you must, as you see fit.
> >
> > - F.
> >
>
> Who were you before March 8?
>
> Uncle Davey
The same person I am today. I have no other identities, and never
have.
- F.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|