news:892cb437.0402281241.346bd40c@posting.google.com...
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
news:<c1q3ja$muf$0@pita.alt.net>...
>
> > So is this fossil a bird or is it a reptile?
> >
> Oh I see. We are going to get another standard creationist argument. I
> now have to say either 'It's a bird', in which case you'll say 'Then
> it can't be a reptile' or I say 'It's a reptile' in which case you say
> 'Then it can't be a bird'.
>
> Using this mode of argument, there can never be any intermediate
> between birds and reptiles. But it is not a very good argument, as
> even a five year old child can tell.
>
> Archaeopteryx is classified as a bird. It has anatomical features that
> it shares with modern birds, and anatomical features it shares with
> dinosaurs.
>
> > If hoatzins don't have bony tails now, then that's not a big issue.
Within
> > cats and dogs, tail length differs greatly.
> >
> How about birds? Ever seen a bird with a long, bony tail?
You just said it was a bird.
Modern birds
> have no bony tail. None of them. They have a structure called a
> pygidium. No modern bird has teeth. They have beaks, unlike
> Archeopteryx. Look out of your window and see if you can spot any
> birds with teeth.
So how did the beak evolve then?
Where are the millions of fossils of the intervening structure between
toothed jaws and a beak?
>
> > Kindly explain to me the evolution of the feather,
>
> There is a good series of feathered dinosaurs which demonstrate the
> evolution of feathers very well. I would guess that a simple web
> search would tell you all about it. I can't be bothered to do it for
> you, as you won't take any notice of it no matter how good the
> evidence.
If you cannot present the evidence, then I certainly won't.
I usually do look at most things people take the trouble to find for me. I
may not agree with them, that's any thinking man's prerogative.
>
> >and what the drivers were
> > behind that evolution when skin flaps were fine for pteradactyls and
still
> > are for chiroptera, which handle flight better than many birds.
>
> Completely and utterly irrelevant. Evolution is not predictable, any
> more than the long-term movements of the planets, or the weather are
> predictable.
>
That's just a blanket cop-out.
> >
> >
> Uncle Davey
>
> Once again, you are trying to argue from ignorance. I don't think
> anyone is in the slightest bit persuaded.
>
> RF
Why didn't crocodiles die out with the other large reptiles?
Are they immune to the iridium layer, or what?
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 |
| 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 |
| 180 | 181 |
|