| Re: So atheism isn't a religion, after all, then. |
www.usenetposts.com |
| Uncle Davey (noway@jose.com) |
2004/02/23 21:31 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: So atheism isn't a religion, after all, then.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:31:31 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: www.usenetposts.com
Lines: 16
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <c1ck6r$glg$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <1035be0pogo6f2f@corp.supernews.com> <23256-4032B3CA-18@storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net> <2b68957a.0402180251.7a34c624@posting.google.com> <c0vmd3$tgn$0@pita.alt.net> <c1chp5$1gs9jl$1@ID-87341.news.uni-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1077597091 49858 128.100.83.246 (24 Feb 2004 04:31:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:31:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2692
> > Alright, I found that fairly convincing, maybe atheism, per se, isn't a
> > religion, but it becomes like a religion to some people.
> > How about that?
>
> Wrong of course. Even if someone promotes atheism fanatically, there's
> still no deity involved.
>
Who said all religions need a deity?
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|
|