alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: No More "Dr." Gastrich Until 2005 Newsfeeds.com http://www ..
\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank (lflank_nospam@ij.net) 2004/02/23 17:10

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: No More "Dr." Gastrich Until 2005
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:10:10 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
Lines: 131
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <403a974e$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
References: <Wr%Xb.4041$Le2.571@twister.socal.rr.com> <ca3130pnj61gk2v4c5v66solrkqavq04jm@4ax.com> <yt0Yb.4053$Le2.1504@twister.socal.rr.com> <24713099p3ooujglpghqcmhcathib1j1ee@4ax.com> <7k1Yb.4064$Le2.3303@twister.socal.rr.com> <pan.2004.02.17.05.09.22.375006@mail.utexas.edu> <wilkins-AA94F0.16170417022004@news.fu-berlin.de> <c0skuh$l07$0@pita.alt.net> <1g9bm90.14owp6z948jb4N%john_SPAM@wilkins.id.au> <c0t8oe$aj7$0@pita.alt.net> <wilkins-AE3DB9.10054818022004@news.fu-berlin.de> <c0v6vr$a4v$0@pita.alt.net> <40336877$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <c11ndc$f0i$1@pita.alt.net> <1g9fnp3.dp73mj12lpsucN%see.sig@for.addy> <c150cd$vuo$0@pita.alt.net> <1g9g6ej.vp33qh1x9ymufN%see.sig@for.addy> <slrnc3cb6r.1hg.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem> <c15b9j$iv0$0@pita.alt.net> <40369d04$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <c1dlud$ib7$0@pita.alt.net> <c1dm94$pi5$4@woodrow.ucdavis.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1077581410 43740 128.100.83.246 (24 Feb 2004 00:10:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:10:10 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <c1dm94$pi5$4@woodrow.ucdavis.edu>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.234.67.243
X-Comments: This message was posted through <A href
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone,
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to
X-Comments3: <A href ="http://www.newsgroups.com">Visit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2004 00:14:07.0580 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E72F1C0:01C3FA6B]
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox3.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Dec 3 2003 15:07:19, 0.0/5.0 2.63)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 32613 i1O0E7ZD063394 mailbox3.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2689



Richard Crawford wrote:

> Uncle Davey wrote:
>
>


>>
>>
>>>Uncle Davey wrote:
>>>
>>>

>>>>news:slrnc3cb6r.1hg.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:10:36 +0000 (UTC),
>>>>>Victor Eijkhout <see.sig@for.addy> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

>>>>>>>news:1g9fnp3.dp73mj12lpsucN%see.sig@for.addy...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In my opinion, a Biblical kind is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What do you mean "in your opinion"? Shouldn't this sentence start "It
>>>>
>>>>is
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>one of the basic results of creation science that a biblical kind is
>>>>>>>>.." ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I mean, this question has come up before, why don't you guys have a
>>>>
>>>>nice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>consensus answer by now?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>V.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Vic, for all I know there is one, and I just don't know about it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm a freethinker, anyway, so consensus answers don't interest me
>>
>>much.
>>
>>
>>>>>>>Uncle Davey
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're not concerned with science, in other words.
>>>>>
>>>>>Only when he thinks he can bullshit the faithful with pseudo-science.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Was that nice?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Was it nice to flood us with sockpuppets, post sexual crudeness under
>>>your "Constance" avatar, and forge emails from Bible Bob?
>>
>>
>>No, that's why I said sorry and stopped.
>>
>>4 weeks of that seem to have given you 7 weeks of mileage.
>>
>>Is that altogether in proportion?
>>
>>Uncle Davey
>>
>>
>
>
> I tend to side with UD on this one.  If he has stopped the behavior and
> apologized for his error there really is no need to keep bringing it
> back as it only distracts from the real discussion (and leads
> dangerously close to ad hominem argumentation).
>


Bullshit.  He demonstrated himself, right in front of everyone, to be a
dishonest liar.  If he wants to keep presenting himself here as a
paragon of godliness and holiness, then I will keep pointing out to
everyone that he is a demonstrated and unmistakable dishonest liar --
i.e., he is a hypocrite who lies for the Lord.

All of his religious ramblings boil down to one thing: "trust me".  And
he has demonstrated conclusively that he is not worthy of trust.

If he doesn't like that, he has only himself to blame.





===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"

Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank

DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
30313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite