news:slrnc3chfp.1c4.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem...
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:04:27 +0000 (UTC),
> Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
> >
> > news:1g9g6ej.vp33qh1x9ymufN%see.sig@for.addy...
> >> Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > news:1g9fnp3.dp73mj12lpsucN%see.sig@for.addy...
> >> > > Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > In my opinion, a Biblical kind is
> >> > >
> >> > > What do you mean "in your opinion"? Shouldn't this sentence start
"It
> > is
> >> > > one of the basic results of creation science that a biblical kind
is
> >> > > .." ?
> >> > >
> >> > > I mean, this question has come up before, why don't you guys have a
> > nice
> >> > > consensus answer by now?
> >> > >
> >> > > V.
> >> >
> >> > Vic, for all I know there is one, and I just don't know about it.
> >> >
> >> > I'm a freethinker, anyway, so consensus answers don't interest me
much.
> >> >
> >> > Uncle Davey
> >>
> >> You're not concerned with science, in other words.
> >>
> >> V.
> >
> > Not overly, no.
> >
> > I'm more concerned with faith.
>
> And yet you feel compelled to make up stories about the Tower of Babel.
> That sounds more like somebody trying to create at least a
pseudo-scientific
> position to back up their faith.
>
I'm just showing you that neither your evidence explains anything nor mine
does, and at the end of the day it's down to what you CHOOSE to believe.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 |
|