Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Which language is easier to learn?
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 01:03:50 +0200
Organization: Tadex Niejadex
Lines: 83
Sender: piorokrat@autograf.pl@pk146.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
Message-ID: <bfsd1g$1i$1@news.onet.pl>
References: <3F1E1699.66A8717@nospam.com> <Xns93C1B33DD4214SCROSS3ncrrcom@24.25.9.41> <3F1FF2F8.468B@alphalink.com.au> <3F1FF74F.2CE113C9@kaba.com> <3F2116A5.3FB7@alphalink.com.au> <3F210EEF.4B735EB0@kaba.com> <3F211D55.C3ED6754@nospam.com> <bfrafh$jb2$1@news.onet.pl> <3F21463B.6070502@nospam.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pk146.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-Trace: news.onet.pl 1059174256 50 213.76.106.146 (25 Jul 2003 23:04:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@onet.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Jul 2003 23:04:16 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:23
Uzytkownik "Cellus Purfluxius" <Jacek@nospam.com> napisal w wiadomosci
news:3F21463B.6070502@nospam.com...
> Piorokrat wrote:
>
> >Uzytkownik "Andrew Nowicki" <andrew@nospam.com> napisal w wiadomosci
> >news:3F211D55.C3ED6754@nospam.com...
> >
> >
> >>Andrew Nowicki wrote:
> >> AN> The most important feature of an international
> >> AN> auxiliary language is simplicity.
> >>
> >>Rick Harrison wrote:
> >> RH> Well, I disagree... I think the most important
> >> RH> feature would be some reason, some incentive that
> >> RH> would persuade someone other than language
> >> RH> nuts and utopian idealists to learn it.
> >>
> >>Euroclones are boring, hard to learn for those who
> >>do not speak European languages, and they have plenty
> >>of warts.
> >>
> >>The perfect IAL must have a unique feature that makes
> >>it fun to work with it. Ygyde has such a feature - it
> >>is fun to coin new compound words in Ygyde.
> >>
> >> RH> A 2-letter prefix is no more complex than a 1-letter prefix
> >>
> >>If this is true, than a 3-letter prefix is no more
> >>complex that the 2-letter prefix, which is no more
> >>complex than the 1-letter prefix...
> >>
> >>By the way, Ygyde has one-letter prefixes and no affixes.
> >>
> >>============================================================
> >>
> >>Jacques Guy wrote:
> >> JG> Exactly right. There is even worse: "can" and "can't"
> >> JG> in some varieties of American English.
> >>
> >> JG> This is a reason why I think that Indonesian is difficult:
> >> JG> many words differ by only one letter. Binatang "insect",
> >> JG> bintang "star", merah "red", marah "angry", and so on.
> >>
> >>Good IAL is free of homonyms and all its words sound
> >>differently. Some 3 letter long Ygyde words differ by
> >>one letter only. Longer words differ by more than one letter
> >>except related adjective-noun-verb words. For example:
> >>
> >>analytical = emydu = "adjective separation knowledge"
> >>analysis = omydu = "noun separation knowledge"
> >>to analyze = imydu = "verb separation knowledge"
> >>
> >>It is possible to make Ygyde-like language which does not
> >>have words differing by one letter only. Words of this
> >>language would be on average longer than Ygyde words.
> >>English gets away with homonyms, so I guess that the one
> >>letter only difference is not a big deal.
> >>
> >>============================================================
> >>
> >>http://www.medianet.pl/~andrew/ygyde/ygyde.htm
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Ipo ibu ydezu ine ufoli? Yta-odysesi?
> >
> Numai neuki mozhe-mozhe predlozhe neitrali miri jezik!
>
> Bhafa
>
> Cellus P.
>
>
Mozhe biti on jezyk velmi neitralni.
Lhiut'n,
Uncle Davey
|
|