Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Lenny Flank <lflank_nospam@ij.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: David Horn's Fish
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:34:18 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
Lines: 86
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <3ff00345$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
References: <RZlGb.21052$C87.492@twister.socal.rr.com> <273ab496.0312261008.31f5ae8f@posting.google.com> <Xns945DBCF0B1B50doldridgsprintca@24.69.255.211> <bB7Hb.29390$nG3.8523@twister.socal.rr.com> <pan.2003.12.27.04.44.14.874655@cox.net> <sbeHb.29845$nG3.20648@twister.socal.rr.com> <bsjvae$dut$0@pita.alt.net> <3fedb19d$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsl1so$pud$0@pita.alt.net> <slrnbusk6l.1qo.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem> <35fa3772.0312280651.56c1e8e1@posting.google.com> <slrnbuu633.1c8.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem> <bsos76$q3k$1@news.onet.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1072694058 43311 128.100.83.246 (29 Dec 2003 10:34:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:34:18 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <bsos76$q3k$1@news.onet.pl>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.234.67.243
X-Comments: This message was posted through <A href
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone,
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to
X-Comments3: <A href ="http://www.newsgroups.com">Visit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2003 10:35:15.0309 (UTC) FILETIME=[723359D0:01C3CDF7]
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox5.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Oct 30 2003 22:20:52, 0.0/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 59731 hBTAZF6B067443 mailbox5.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1466
Piorokrat wrote:
>
> This appears to have started with David Horn challenging Dr Gastrich to a
> discussion of Rift Valley Cichlids, then Constance calling on my authority
> as an ichthyologist
You are not an ichthyologist. Your opinion on ichthyology is no more
authoritative than your opinion about theology.
If we can confine the discussion to the Cichlids of lake
> Tanganyika, then I'll be happy to expand on what I've kept, what I've bred
> and what I've read.
What does any of that have to do with evolution.
>
> The question which interests me here more immediately is, can a fishkeeper
> be an ichthyologist or not? If we look at some of the greatest
> ichthyologists, most of them keep fishes in aquariums, although not all as
> their hobby.
What does any of that have to do with evolution.
>
> In short, when fishkeepers and museum ichthyologists meet, there is a lot to
> talk about, but also no shortage of friction also.
>
What does any of that have to do with evolution.
> In the end what is useful, what can be applied out of ichthyology is what it
> can give to other fields. The museum ichthyologists tend to be given grants
> to study things like cod's brains, because that could help our chances of
> controlling food stocks. They are not being paid to provide info for the
> aquarium hobby, and yet our hobby is a multi million pound industry too, but
> has to pretty much look after itself.
>
What does any of that have to do with evolution.
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 |
|