news:3feff342$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> Piorokrat wrote:
> > news:bsn2kv$elk73$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> >>"Constance Vigilant" <anybodyleft@arthurandersen.com> wrote in message
> >>news:bsmtie$d0d$0@pita.alt.net...
> >>
> >>sniipping
> >>
> >>
> >>>>However, I think your point stands. The simple fact that one delves
> >>>>in aquaria does not make one an expert in anything unless that
> >>>>expertise is actually shown.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Maybe someone can e-mail him and then he can see this and we'll see if
> >
> > he
> >
> >>>knows about fish or not.
> >>
> >>I'm sure he's quite knowlegeable about aquarium catfish. However, I
> >
> > don't
> >
> >>think you should be looking to Davy for support on anything else. After
> >
> > his
> >
> >>recent Archaeopteryx/Hoazin debacle, his credibility on anything other
> >
> > than
> >
> >>catfish is highly in doubt.
> >>
> >>
> >>DJT
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > How many Archaeopteryx fossils are there again?
> >
>
>
>
>
> Eight.
>
> Plus Caudipteryx and about a dozen other species.
>
That's not good news, I have to say.
I liked it better when there was only one.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 |
|