Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: John Harshman <jharshman.diespamdie@pacbell.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Hello T.O.
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
Lines: 28
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <3FE452BC.2070006@pacbell.net>
References: <lbTCb.16305$HL2.15776@twister.socal.rr.com> <ecUCb.6254$qq.560@bignews1.bellsouth.net> <DFUCb.16309$HL2.2582@twister.socal.rr.com> <brh9ov$39qhe$1@ID-137900.news.uni-berlin.de> <wjWCb.16355$HL2.14048@twister.socal.rr.com> <abdf273b.0312141025.4f5f2638@posting.google.com> <ILdDb.6301$Oh1.248@twister.socal.rr.com> <brk149$n9e$5@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu> <brkkbn$6uj$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <brmtke$1cc$1@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu> <brnqra$2r2$1@news.onet.pl> <bruhiu$s7j$1@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu> <brv0qp$gv$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3FE3065C.9010705@pacbell.net> <bs06a0$m3t$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3FE38762.2090507@pacbell.net> <bs1k9r$nup$1@news.onet.pl> <SWYEb.11742$xB5.7161@bignews1.bellsouth.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1071937683 29211 128.100.83.246 (20 Dec 2003 16:28:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:28:03 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011130 Netscape6/6.2.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.166.23.45
X-UserInfo1: FKPO@SND]JVWS_HXCJKXOFTBTR\B@GXLN@GZ_GYO^JWTEPIB_NVUAH_[BL[\IRKIANGGJBFNJF_DOLSCENSY^U@FRFUEXR@KFXYDBPWBCDQJA@X_DCBHXR[C@\EOKCJLED_SZ@RMWYXYWE_P@\\GOIW^@SYFFSWHFIXMADO@^[ADPRPETLBJ]RDGENSKQQZN
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by newssvr29-ext.news.prodigy.com id hBKGWIKc030652
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by darwin.ediacara.org id hBKGRvmN029201
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1210
Boikat wrote:
> "Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote in message
> news:bs1k9r$nup$1@news.onet.pl...
>
>>
>
>
> <snip>
>
>>>Precisely. One could list a similar set of problems with considering
>>>Archaeopteryx a hoatzin. Only your ignorance of ornithology lets you do
>>>something you would never consider with regard to fish.
>>>
>>Why is archaeopteryx not a hoatzin?
>>
>
> For exactly the same reason a chicken is not a hoatzin.
Except more so. Chickens and hoatzins are, after all, both neognaths and
both neorniths.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 |
| 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 |
| 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 |
| 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 |
|