In <bs1kla$b2p$1@news.onet.pl>, "Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl>
wrote:
>
>news:7se7uv422g4ur35ouju6d10vv6c2ib4a86@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:34:14 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
>> <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
The first message in the thread refers to:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1110212,00.html?79%3A+International+news+%2D+guardian
>> May I ask what your point is?
>This is a news group, that was news, I addressed it to the groups that I
>expected to receive some intelligent commentary from.
Hmm. News to you, I guess? For folks with a mild interest in science,
dark matter and dark energy have been interesting topics for at least
a couple of years now. The breakthrough was confirmation of what had
been expected for some time before.
The work cited demonstrates a couple of useful things: One, that in
science, observation trumps theory, and Two, that surprises can await
*within* a well-established theoretical framework like the Big Bang.
Regarding the thread name - As a talk.origins reader I can only answer
the question as 'yes' in the sense of "first verses of Genesis" as a
metaphor for the beginning of the observable universe. I don't see
this cosmological work as offering any illumination on the actual
text.
>Of course, not everyone will be able to, I expect that.
>
>Uncle Davey
I await with interest your own comments on the article.
Jack Dominey
jack_dominey (at) email (dot) com
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 |
|