Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "::Y-Not::" <%+14$-Y-Not@here-and.there>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.smeagol
Subject: Re: PING Y-NOT (the real one)
Date: 9 May 2006 20:42:02 -0500
Organization: Can Help
Lines: 117
Message-ID: <090520062140195244%%+14$-Y-Not@here-and.there>
References: <68b16292ichgma75pac5c92qh74q4mes07@4ax.com> <lhp1629b4vv2a8js88vfcf3adtc1i8no53@4ax.com>
Reply-To: ::Y Not::
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User_Agent: Thoth/1.7.2 (Great Mac Program!)
X-No-Archive: yes
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.smeagol:558
In article <lhp1629b4vv2a8js88vfcf3adtc1i8no53@4ax.com>, Mephistopheles
<no-fixed@address.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 May 2006 14:04:15 GMT, "go||um (or whoever you think I am)"
> <ooey@gooey.speeyooey> wrote:
>
> >Hi:
> >
> >Please help abc. He seems to be suffering from paranoid delusions. He
> >thinks everyone is me, but as you know, I hardly ever post anymore. In
> >fact, I would not have even noticed had he not posted some wonderful
> >pics of new-star Jimmy (thank you thank you thank you).
> >
> >Have fun helping.
> >
> >-g:)
>
> Why would you be troubled so on abc's account?
>
> I would have honestly thought abc's opinion on this matter would have
> held no measurable significance for you. And at the same time I don't
> imagine YN's intercessory powers would carry much weight with abc.
>
> Or is there a sub-text here that escapes me? I assure you I come in
> friendship, & made my way on foot, having left my horse, Trigger,
> outside. LOL
>
> Mephi.........somewhat bemused.
For your un-bemusement...
The impersonator posted as me in another group, to abc. abc then
accused Gollum of doing it. Here is my reply to that post, which
contains the other posts in the thread:
[quote]
Re: PING: abc
In article <FqV7g.432719$7i1.115167@fe06.news.easynews.com>,
Hay-Bee-Sea <Hay-Bee-See@wobbleyou_ex_why_zee.com> wrote:
>
> On 7-May-2006, "::Y-Not::" <%+13$-Y-Not@here.com> posted:
>
> > Isn't it time you and I worked together, instead of agains our common
> > interests?
>
> I *once* made a mistaken apology to you, Gollum.
>
> Never again.
>
> May the present crackup you seem to be heading for, be the biggest and best
> ever and hopefully it will remove you and the big lumps of doggy-doo you
> keep trying to lay down for poor innocents to walk in.
>
> Crack up, Gollum! Please! Crack up!
>
> You never, *ever* fitted in as you tried to flit and dodge and alternate
> between playing the fool and playing the lump of dog shit you truly are, and
> you now prove your true worth with your forged posts. Do you remember your
> first ever forgery, Gollum? So long ago, so far away, and for you, in so
> much happier times. A lot of us realised right then just what you truly are.
>
> You ain't happy now, are you, G Man?
> --
> abc
How many times are you going to retract that week apology?
The one time you actually did something socially right, must still pain
you. Do you even know why?
Psst:
Do you remember a BL poster named "birdie" (also sometimes "mike", but
there were more than one of those)? He used to do a lot of
impersonations. I caught him at it in my discussion group after he
posted as Ninja in the Fort, but didn't completely change his header
back for posting as "himself". He admitted it after I confronted him.
He was quite a disturbed individual. He STILL is.
abc, you are wrong on two levels. Technical and social.
Gollum posts only through Easynews. The impersonator doesn't, and can't
completely coverup that he isn't. Ask Q about header comparison.
Gollum has never actually impersonated anyone to deceive, despite your
accusations. And he would absolutely NEVER even THINK of impersonating
ME! How could you even suspect he would? Where is your social
awareness? Have you no understanding of people at all?
Gollum isn't a G-Man, and neither is the actual impersonator. But then,
YOU have acted more like one than any other Fort poster I know. How
many have you reported to their NSPs, or threatened to? Do you need to
accuse people, to try to throw the suspicion off of yourself?
As I've said many times before, be careful the tactics you use, lest
they be turned against you to greater affect. The attacker is most
vulnerable when he is attacking. That's why I don't.
Do you remember the group in which I debated "loyalty"? There, Gollum
asked Meph to address this issue with you, but Meph seems to be
somewhat confused about it. Please go there and put the issue to rest.
This time you owe Gollum a BIG apology. Would it be too much to expect
such a thing?
Who knows, but when Gollum is finished with his current VERY busy
situation in a few years, he may actually become a G-Man. He sure would
be a good one. And of course, this society could use another BL on the
inside (of LEA), right? :-)
Y Not
"Paying attention, costs you little.
Not paying attention, can cost you everything."
[end quote]
|
|