On Tue, 9 May 2006 18:42:02 -0700, Y-Not:: wrote
(in article <090520062140195244%%+14$-Y-Not@here-and.there>):
> In article <lhp1629b4vv2a8js88vfcf3adtc1i8no53@4ax.com>, Mephistopheles
> <no-fixed@address.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 09 May 2006 14:04:15 GMT, "go||um (or whoever you think I am)"
>> <ooey@gooey.speeyooey> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>> Please help abc. He seems to be suffering from paranoid delusions. He
>>> thinks everyone is me, but as you know, I hardly ever post anymore. In
>>> fact, I would not have even noticed had he not posted some wonderful
>>> pics of new-star Jimmy (thank you thank you thank you).
>>>
>>> Have fun helping.
>>>
>>> -g:)
>>
>> Why would you be troubled so on abc's account?
>>
>> I would have honestly thought abc's opinion on this matter would have
>> held no measurable significance for you. And at the same time I don't
>> imagine YN's intercessory powers would carry much weight with abc.
>>
>> Or is there a sub-text here that escapes me? I assure you I come in
>> friendship, & made my way on foot, having left my horse, Trigger,
>> outside. LOL
>>
>> Mephi.........somewhat bemused.
>
>
> For your un-bemusement...
>
> The impersonator posted as me in another group, to abc. abc then
> accused Gollum of doing it. Here is my reply to that post, which
> contains the other posts in the thread:
>
> [quote]
>
> Re: PING: abc
>
> In article <FqV7g.432719$7i1.115167@fe06.news.easynews.com>,
> Hay-Bee-Sea <Hay-Bee-See@wobbleyou_ex_why_zee.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7-May-2006, "::Y-Not::" <%+13$-Y-Not@here.com> posted:
>>
>>> Isn't it time you and I worked together, instead of agains our common
>>> interests?
>>
>> I *once* made a mistaken apology to you, Gollum.
>>
>> Never again.
>>
>> May the present crackup you seem to be heading for, be the biggest and best
>> ever and hopefully it will remove you and the big lumps of doggy-doo you
>> keep trying to lay down for poor innocents to walk in.
>>
>> Crack up, Gollum! Please! Crack up!
>>
>> You never, *ever* fitted in as you tried to flit and dodge and alternate
>> between playing the fool and playing the lump of dog shit you truly are, and
>> you now prove your true worth with your forged posts. Do you remember your
>> first ever forgery, Gollum? So long ago, so far away, and for you, in so
>> much happier times. A lot of us realised right then just what you truly are.
>>
>> You ain't happy now, are you, G Man?
>> --
>> abc
>
>
> How many times are you going to retract that week apology?
> The one time you actually did something socially right, must still pain
> you. Do you even know why?
>
> Psst:
> Do you remember a BL poster named "birdie" (also sometimes "mike", but
> there were more than one of those)? He used to do a lot of
> impersonations. I caught him at it in my discussion group after he
> posted as Ninja in the Fort, but didn't completely change his header
> back for posting as "himself". He admitted it after I confronted him.
> He was quite a disturbed individual. He STILL is.
>
> abc, you are wrong on two levels. Technical and social.
> Gollum posts only through Easynews. The impersonator doesn't, and can't
> completely coverup that he isn't. Ask Q about header comparison.
> Gollum has never actually impersonated anyone to deceive, despite your
> accusations. And he would absolutely NEVER even THINK of impersonating
> ME! How could you even suspect he would? Where is your social
> awareness? Have you no understanding of people at all?
>
> Gollum isn't a G-Man, and neither is the actual impersonator. But then,
> YOU have acted more like one than any other Fort poster I know. How
> many have you reported to their NSPs, or threatened to? Do you need to
> accuse people, to try to throw the suspicion off of yourself?
> As I've said many times before, be careful the tactics you use, lest
> they be turned against you to greater affect. The attacker is most
> vulnerable when he is attacking. That's why I don't.
>
> Do you remember the group in which I debated "loyalty"? There, Gollum
> asked Meph to address this issue with you, but Meph seems to be
> somewhat confused about it. Please go there and put the issue to rest.
> This time you owe Gollum a BIG apology. Would it be too much to expect
> such a thing?
>
> Who knows, but when Gollum is finished with his current VERY busy
> situation in a few years, he may actually become a G-Man. He sure would
> be a good one. And of course, this society could use another BL on the
> inside (of LEA), right? :-)
>
>
> Y Not
>
>
> "Paying attention, costs you little.
> Not paying attention, can cost you everything."
>
> [end quote]
Truth be known, I don't recall you "debating" anything.
|
|