Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:05:32 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.fan.smeagol
Subject: Re: Re beauty in drawing II
From: R <doh@.com>
References: <999f9493b65c2170b29a78cdfdacd5c3@dizum.com>
Organization: FrytexCo
Message-ID: <Xns9BE9ADDF7D585dohcom@216.196.109.131>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:05:32 -0500
Lines: 26
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-6bgtH3fNW1+cuNKPR3M+XXFexA6B6DHs173OuJ1cX7Jv/idxRQjkyhy4bGlyGKbivwZE9cAv0KnLUJl!YWoo3o+x0eR/XYXD+NNcJ6LY44QVIA7prEpaZA9FssyYmmzl9jFU6l9ekUpWr9QkZhI=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
X-Original-Bytes: 2072
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.smeagol:1485
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:999f9493b65c2170b29a78cdfdacd5c3@dizum.com:
> I think, too, that people need to *find* beauty, need to *work* to
> *discover* it. If they are presented with *obligatory* beauty, in
other
> words, something which has the expectation that it *will* (as in
> "should" and "must") be seen as beautiful, then that beauty will be as
a
> result less compelling and involving than what they participatate in
> creating with the artist.
>
> Beauty is not a one-man (-boy!) show, it emerges somewhere in the area
> of interaction between the artist, the object (subject), and the >
viewer.
I guess that's what some italian would call 'opera aperta'
PS.
Oisters! One never knows who can be found here in the groups. It's been
a long, long time since I read you, MO. How are you? It seems that you
are happy, what makes me happy too, a little at least.
BTW perhaps you don't remember me, but I admit I've been thinking about
you some times, so--> kind and warm regards from the most inglorious
shakesperian character, cool hand Romeo.
|
|