R <doh@.com> wrote in news:Xns9BE9ADDF7D585dohcom@216.196.109.131:
> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
> news:999f9493b65c2170b29a78cdfdacd5c3@dizum.com:
>
>> I think, too, that people need to *find* beauty, need to *work* to
>> *discover* it. If they are presented with *obligatory* beauty, in
> other
>> words, something which has the expectation that it *will* (as in
>> "should" and "must") be seen as beautiful, then that beauty will be
as
> a
>> result less compelling and involving than what they participatate in
>> creating with the artist.
>>
>> Beauty is not a one-man (-boy!) show, it emerges somewhere in the
area
>> of interaction between the artist, the object (subject), and the >
> viewer.
>
> I guess that's what some italian would call 'opera aperta'
>
> PS.
> Oisters! One never knows who can be found here in the groups. It's
been
> a long, long time since I read you, MO. How are you? It seems that you
> are happy, what makes me happy too, a little at least.
> BTW perhaps you don't remember me, but I admit I've been thinking
about
> you some times, so--> kind and warm regards from the most inglorious
> shakesperian character, cool hand Romeo.
jesuschrist&obama, don't be so effusive, try to contain your emotion! :P
|
|