Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: BusyGuy <BusyGuy@Work.ru>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: Oprah's child predator watch list
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 12:25:35 +0400
Organization: "Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com"
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <230420061225352858%BusyGuy@Work.ru>
References: <1145596391.463752.97210@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1145630284.899780.46610@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1145659941.594870.228030@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <220420061141382683%BusyGuy@Work.ru> <1145756348.500236.63880@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: BusyGuy@Work.Ru
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Thoth/1.7.2 (Carbon/OS X)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:961
In article <1145756348.500236.63880@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
<christopherkidwell3@comcast.net> wrote:
> BusyGuy wrote:
> > In article <1145659941.594870.228030@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > <christopherkidwell3@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Now, I take issue with something on here. They are saying that those
> > > children who were killed recently in 'sexual' crimes were killed by
> > > pedophiles. BULLSHIT! Those people were no more pedophiles, than adult
> > > rapists are heterosexuals!
> >
> >
> > Oops. you got that dangerously-wrong !
> >
> > "Adult rapists" are a subset of "Heterosexuals."
> >
> > "Child killers" are not a subset of "Pedophiles".
> >
> > "Child killers" and "pedophiles" are both subsets of "General
> > population." Otherwise, they are antagonists. (chalk/cheese.)
>
> Actually, think about it this way. The defintion of a heterosexual is
> "A man/woman who has consensual, loving sexual encounters with a
> woman/man." The definition of a rapist is "A man/woman who FORCES
> sexual encounters on women/men and gets pleasure by dominating them."
>
> How are rapists a subset of heterosexual men?
Slow down, Christopher. I've pointed out to you before how unwise it is
to mis-quote.
I did not say "rapists are a subset of heterosexual men" i said
"heterosexuals."
The standard definition (well, let's not be arrogant; _my_ definition)
of a heterosexual is "a person who is sexually- and/or
romantically-attracted to the opposite gender."
Try "manifestation of sexual passion for one of the opposite sex..."
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterosexual> (I didn't like the last two
words so I clipped them.)
or "of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual
desire toward individuals of the opposite sex"
<http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=heterosexual>
or "Heterosexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by romantic
love or sexual desire exclusively for members of the opposite sex or
gender...."
<http://encycl.opentopia.com/term/Heterosexuality>
There is no mention of a "consensual" or even "reciprocal" element
being required. Indeed, probably 99% of all adult heterosexual males
experience lust, sometimes strong passion, for women or a particuar
woman, a hundred times a day without the woman consenting to that
emotion because she is simply unaware of its existence. The object of
their lust could be a heterosexual woman or could be a lesbian or a
ball-breaking bitch, the guy usually has no way of knowing.
No relationship is required in order to define a person as a
heterosexual so there need be no sex or any other contact at all. It is
an orientation, not a behavior.
I'll snip the rest of your post because, frankly, it's all nonsense.
|
|