BusyGuy wrote:
> In article <1145659941.594870.228030@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> <christopherkidwell3@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Now, I take issue with something on here. They are saying that those
> > children who were killed recently in 'sexual' crimes were killed by
> > pedophiles. BULLSHIT! Those people were no more pedophiles, than adult
> > rapists are heterosexuals!
>
>
> Oops. you got that dangerously-wrong !
>
> "Adult rapists" are a subset of "Heterosexuals."
>
> "Child killers" are not a subset of "Pedophiles".
>
> "Child killers" and "pedophiles" are both subsets of "General
> population." Otherwise, they are antagonists. (chalk/cheese.)
Actually, think about it this way. The defintion of a heterosexual is
"A man/woman who has consensual, loving sexual encounters with a
woman/man." The definition of a rapist is "A man/woman who FORCES
sexual encounters on women/men and gets pleasure by dominating them."
How are rapists a subset of heterosexual men? No heterosexual man EVER
forces sexual encounters on a woman, so he can't be called a rapist.
Just like in the opposite situation with women and men.
Same way that no rapist EVER has consensual sexual encounters with
women, so he isn't a heterosexual. Now, I will know that some people
will say "Some men do have consensual encounters with women who are
rapists!" but they aren't rapists then.
They are more situational sex offenders, who get so sexually frustrated
or have such a high libido, that they can't control themselves
sometimes and rape women. If they were in their right mind, they
wouldn't do it, but somebody or something else comes out when they get
too sexually frustrated.
That's what I have realized after meeting situational sex offenders and
actual rapists.
|
|