Frank McCoy wrote:
> In alt.support.girl-lovers "Dr.Reality"
> <james_riske@nothingwillhappen_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Frank McCoy wrote:
>>
>>>In alt.support.girl-lovers Shagrat <dnsaundersSHAGRAT@sympatico.ca>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Dr.Reality" <james_riske@nothingwillhappen_hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>news:ctrq43$glf$2@pita.alt.net:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>You just lied again Frank, you have not proven your hilarious babble ....
>>>>
>>>>There is no greater source of "hilarious babble" in these groups than the
>>>>hate-filled psychopath Altered Reality.
>>>>
>>>>Still, his proposed solution to pedophilia, "Put a gun in your mouth
>>>>pedophile, that is your only hope," would have a truly beneficial effect:
>>>>it would cure the world's overpopulation problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>A little *too* well, methinks.
>>>There wouldn't be enough people left to find each other and continue
>>>the Human Race ... Not that the few psychopaths left would even WANT
>>>to; since they wouldn't find those of the opposite sex of
>>>child-bearing age appealing.
>>>
>>
>>
>>It is good to see you continue to lie on usenet Frank, and to be honest
>>I didn't expect anything to be different from you.
>>You are a proven liar, you couldn't prove that 99.9% of the population
>>is comprised of pedophiles, you lied, plain and simple.
>
>
> I did so-prove.
> You haven't the guts to even answer the post or point out even one
> inaccuracy in it, because there isn't any there for you to find.
>
> All you can do is *claim* my proof is no good, because you don't like
> it. Not liking the *results* of a proof doesn't invalidate it.
>
> Each thing I claimed in the proof as fact, is; and you have not been
> able to show even one of the statements I made as being false, let
> alone the overall proof. Still, the proof *would* likely fail if you
> *could* show any one of them to be false.
>
> Do so, and I'll retract the overall statement.
> But you cannot and have not; because they are all true; and mostly
> based on your very own claims! If you invalidate just about any one
> of the statements I made in my proof, then you would likely be calling
> yourself a liar by doing so; since (as I said) most are based on
> things YOU have said before ... and I can prove that also; since I
> keep records of *every* post made in this group (except the spam,
> which sometimes gets in even here).
>
> Therefore: It's YOU that is the liar, because you cannot face the
> truth. The truth isn't that you're a pedophile *as you think of what
> a pedophile is* but that you ARE one by your own definition and that
> of the law. If you don't like that, then change the law.
>
> Note: That's "pedophile", not "child molester". A difference you
> seem to claim on occasion is mere quibbling. If so, then by law and
> your own definitions, that makes you ....
>
> I'm merely holding up a mirror and letting you see how unfair it is
> when YOU are charged by the same accusations and in the same manner
> and with the same "proofs" as you charge others.
>
>>And I'm certain this wont be the last time...
>
>
> Nor will it be the last time I suspect that you will claim victory
> when you just received a resounding defeat.
>
I sure as hell would like to see where you proved 99.9% of the
population are pedos Frank.
Message id please? this should be good.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|