In alt.support.girl-lovers "Dr.Reality"
<james_riske@nothingwillhappen_hotmail.com> wrote:
>Frank McCoy wrote:
>> In alt.support.girl-lovers Shagrat <dnsaundersSHAGRAT@sympatico.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Dr.Reality" <james_riske@nothingwillhappen_hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>news:ctrq43$glf$2@pita.alt.net:
>>>
>>>
>>>>You just lied again Frank, you have not proven your hilarious babble ....
>>>
>>>There is no greater source of "hilarious babble" in these groups than the
>>>hate-filled psychopath Altered Reality.
>>>
>>>Still, his proposed solution to pedophilia, "Put a gun in your mouth
>>>pedophile, that is your only hope," would have a truly beneficial effect:
>>>it would cure the world's overpopulation problem.
>>
>>
>> A little *too* well, methinks.
>> There wouldn't be enough people left to find each other and continue
>> the Human Race ... Not that the few psychopaths left would even WANT
>> to; since they wouldn't find those of the opposite sex of
>> child-bearing age appealing.
>>
>
>
>It is good to see you continue to lie on usenet Frank, and to be honest
>I didn't expect anything to be different from you.
>You are a proven liar, you couldn't prove that 99.9% of the population
>is comprised of pedophiles, you lied, plain and simple.
I did so-prove.
You haven't the guts to even answer the post or point out even one
inaccuracy in it, because there isn't any there for you to find.
All you can do is *claim* my proof is no good, because you don't like
it. Not liking the *results* of a proof doesn't invalidate it.
Each thing I claimed in the proof as fact, is; and you have not been
able to show even one of the statements I made as being false, let
alone the overall proof. Still, the proof *would* likely fail if you
*could* show any one of them to be false.
Do so, and I'll retract the overall statement.
But you cannot and have not; because they are all true; and mostly
based on your very own claims! If you invalidate just about any one
of the statements I made in my proof, then you would likely be calling
yourself a liar by doing so; since (as I said) most are based on
things YOU have said before ... and I can prove that also; since I
keep records of *every* post made in this group (except the spam,
which sometimes gets in even here).
Therefore: It's YOU that is the liar, because you cannot face the
truth. The truth isn't that you're a pedophile *as you think of what
a pedophile is* but that you ARE one by your own definition and that
of the law. If you don't like that, then change the law.
Note: That's "pedophile", not "child molester". A difference you
seem to claim on occasion is mere quibbling. If so, then by law and
your own definitions, that makes you ....
I'm merely holding up a mirror and letting you see how unfair it is
when YOU are charged by the same accusations and in the same manner
and with the same "proofs" as you charge others.
>
>And I'm certain this wont be the last time...
Nor will it be the last time I suspect that you will claim victory
when you just received a resounding defeat.
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|