X-No-Archive: yes
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:10:57 -0500, Fulla Baloney <baloneee@hotsnail.com> wrote:
> nesScitur@husShmail.com (Ronin) wrote in
> news:4c43e36c.14709459@127.0.0.1:
>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:18:15 -0500, Fulla Baloney
>> <baloneee@hotsnail.com> wrote:
>>> nesScitur@husShmail.com (Ronin) wrote in
>>> news:4c437fd4.225322049@127.0.0.1:
>>> Well, I knew it wasn't perfect but my main goal was to get rid of the
>>> ash tray and cigarettes. And red it up a bit while I was at it.
>> The only change made to <after> was to increase its brightness to
>> (roughly) the same as that of <before>, as it appeared somewhat muddy
>> on this system's monitor; do the brightness and colors now look
>> "right" on your monitor?
> Actually, your brightened version is *too* bright on my monitor. But I know
> monitors vary. I have that NVidia Control Panel and my brightness level is
> set at only 17%, contrast 20% and it is still plenty bright.
> --
In short: the system monitor turned out to be grossly out of calibration,
due primarily to the video card's gamma being set to 1.0; with it set to
the maximum Micro$oft's videogame Control Panel thinks appropriate, it is
still out -- but <after> now looks just right and <afterafter> is, indeed,
too bright.
Thanks much for the feedback.
Ronin
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.fan.prettyboy/11507', 'Re: A little touchin up 2 files - yEnc "after.jpg" (1/1) - afterafter.jpg (1/1)')){kind=link}