Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:10173
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
From: Anonymous <cripto@ecn.org>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: Ping - Papus - LOL
Message-ID: <20100518185719.B46E21A7A8F@www.ecn.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 20:57:19 +0200 (CEST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com
Organization: mail2news@dizum.com
Hello,
I agree that the term 'stealing' is a moot point with regards the obtaining and re-using of images that are online and 'in the public domain' anyway; I stand corrected. If parents upload images of their children into unprotected albums they should expect that they may be published elsewhere, anywhere!
I think my point (question) then is only the claim of ownership that some posters in 'boylove' groups have with regards to images of children. When a single posters albums are clearly full of family photos from 'many' families, I am just wondering what process of logic is going on in the posters mind, that can cause them to become possessive of these images.
If however these children 'are' their own, then I would question their motives 'morals' for posting (sharing) said images with other pedophiles 'boy/girllovers if you prefer'. What would be the point?
Regards, Curious Anonymous coward.
|
|