On Tue, 18 May 2010 20:57:19 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous <cripto@ecn.org>
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I agree that the term 'stealing' is a moot point with regards the obtaining and re-using of images that are online and 'in the public domain' anyway; I stand corrected. If parents upload images of their children into unprotected albums they should expect that they may be published elsewhere, anywhere!
>
>I think my point (question) then is only the claim of ownership that some posters in 'boylove' groups have with regards to images of children. When a single posters albums are clearly full of family photos from 'many' families, I am just wondering what process of logic is going on in the posters mind, that can cause them to become possessive of these images.
>
>If however these children 'are' their own, then I would question their motives 'morals' for posting (sharing) said images with other pedophiles 'boy/girllovers if you prefer'. What would be the point?
>
>Regards, Curious Anonymous coward.
I am in complete agreement with your point here, of course. You are
quite correct. I think, as a Boylover, I can state with some general
support that the use of the term Paedophile (or Pedophile, if you
wish), although literally meaning Youth Lover, is always done in a
derogatory manner and in a way to give offense. The placing of the
term Boylover in quotations (single or double) is done for the same
reason ... to give insult and offense, so you will forgive me if I
miscontrued the purpose of your comments in that regard.
Papus has maintained some very nice galleries at imgsrc.ru for quite
some time now, and I do appreciate his efforts. Of course, the
practical aspects of viewing his images there or here hinge on
ease-of-use. As I am sure you know, it can be quite tedious viewing
and securing images at imgsrc.ru. Conversely, thanks to IFB, these
same images can be quickly downloaded and viewed in the newsgroups. As
you also probably comprehend, putting together large galleries at
imsrc.ru involves considerable time and effort, so I can equally
understand why Papus might have felt disrespected by seeing them so
easily accessible here. I therefore applaud all his hard work, and
hope he understands that.
Still I very much agree with your overall assessment.
Sincerely,
Victor
|
|