On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 20:40:41 -0500, "::Y-Not::" <+10$-Y-Not@here.com>
wrote:
>In article <0001HW.BFB75C6E002F5C62F0305550@news.easynews.com>, Caprice
><Caprice@badluck.com> wrote:
>
>> Mr. Michaellikegod:
>>
>> Y-Not is most assuredly not interested in debating theism with you. He is
>> trying to find out more about who you are.
>>
>> You have openly admitted to felonies in the groups...I won't recount them,
>> but I think you can figure out what I'm talking about by re-reading some of
>> your 'confessionals'.
>>
>> If this information and information about who you are is provided to LEA (the
>> kind of thing Y-Not by his own admission has done), you may well be
>> investigated.
>>
>> I don't think that's something you want.
>>
>> My adivice is to stop talking about things and in particularly stop trying to
>> joust with Y-Not. It's a set-up.
>>
>
>Well, should he follow the advice of someone who doesn't follow his own
>advice? :-)
>
>Have you noticed that Michael requires proof? And he's very particular
>about it's quality, too. Too bad you can't give him any.
>
>Please show evidence that I have ever provided information about
>posters to LEA. I sure would like to see how you will try to prove what
>I haven't done. :-)
>
>What I'm doing with Michael, is mostly to entertain PM, because he has
>cut himself off from the Fort, and is missing some fun things.
>With Michael, directly, I'm mildly interested in finding out WHICH
>scripture, among many, he worships.
>Another minor purpose to my involvement with him, is to help him to be
>noticed and taken more seriously by others. I'm giving him the
>opportunity to express himself, to someone who is actually taking him
>seriously. Who else is doing that? Do you think anything useful will
>ever come of his posts, if he stops interacting with me?
>
>Note that he called me "black". Is the messenger worthy of his message?
>No. I wish to help him be so. Do you?
>Which is your true priority here? Michael's welfare, or your obsession
>to attack me wherever you can? Your reputation precedes you.
>
>You promised you would not use security for personal attacks, yet you
>keep doing it, as you are doing here. Isn't your word worth ANYTHING?
>Should I mention your past email security attack? :-)
>
>
>Y Not
>
>
>PS.
>You haven't said whether you agree or disagree with what is in my posts
>or his posts. I'm really interested in your opinions on the actual
>issues we are debating. Please share them. Who knows, he may even
>listen to you.
>By the way, I just gave him a useful web reference. Think he will use
>it?
Hi Y-Not
I require proof of the truth in matters. I don't regard any falsehood.
I stick with many different interpretations of the Bible. I
particularly use the NIV but have posted from an International
Children's Version of the Bible among King James and others. I have at
my disposal about 12 different interpretations of the Bible.
I do not worship the Bible. I worship God the Father, God the Son
(Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit. I do not worship material things
that have been derived out of God's creation.
The fun things you say I am missing out on...hum, what fun things? Is
child pornography a fun thing? Is exploitation of children a fun
thing? Is causing a child to practice immorality a fun thing? Who is
being damaged, the perpetrator or the child? I am an advocate for the
child. Yea, there are some posts in here that are pure in nature like
what BB posted a week ago and then maybe the jpp series, but most of
the content that is posted is child pornography and I will do my best
to post in my messages indirectly that posting such content is wrong.
Then it is the intent of the downloader in using such content to
portray to him/her that such content is immorally wrong to possess and
for whatever purpose it is used, should be stopped.
I do not need to belong to your fort....I do not belong to any
organization. I am just a Christian. I am a bond-servant to Jesus
Christ whom requires that I go forth in the world and spread the good
news about Him and share the gospel and give my testimony of how He
has transformed me by my acceptance and belief in Him. I smile when I
say this about transformation because this transformation can be for
anyone whom God calls upon to be born again and converted by the
washing of the blood of Jesus Christ whom washed my soul by virtue of
the cross.
What have you tried to help me with Y-Not? You have only proved to
yourself that you do not know Scripture because of the words you use
when trying to convey a Scripture message in your posts. If you would
begin to reread Scripture and use the proper word used in the context,
then you would prove to yourself you have no argument in which to base
your point upon.
Actually...LOL...I find this post to be mildly intriguing and positive
for a change without attacking my integrity. Yea, I admit I have a lot
to learn yet for I am still a toddler in the eyes of God just learning
how to walk with Him and realizing that holiness is possible. Holiness
is worthy of absolute devotion to God. I called you "black" because of
the way you have portrayed your knowledge of Scripture. You do not
have the light of Scripture in your heart and your heart is closed or
uncircumcized or I could use other words. I invite you to look up
Scripture and provide the truth to your posts and then maybe the light
will come on.
God Bless
t Michael t
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 |
|