On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:56:57 -0500, Batman <TheB@t.cave> wrote:
>In article <3chl6b55efd8t5vdu2ldl7outhn5ku04ih@4ax.com>,
>Friends@gotham.org says...
>>
>> Wasn't Last Virgins part
>> of LS and not the other LV you mention?
>
>Little Virgins photos bear the LS logo. Last Virgins photos do not. Both
>series have been posted.
>
Once again you are absolutely correct, and I should have checked my
collection before making my post. LV does indeed have the LS logo and
LAV does not. I can also confirm that LV is still available in the
group you mentioned. Thank you for setting me straight ; )
|
|