Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Friends@gotham.org
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.spiderhacker
Subject: Re: Another list mein Kapitan
Message-ID: <p5dm6bhshqd43g4ett5ropb1abii3fofdu@4ax.com>
References: <47fe90d83ee203a8900927e4937e3a95@foto.nl1.torservers.net> <MPG.30d468a1980e8df89896d4@eu.news.astraweb.com> <3chl6b55efd8t5vdu2ldl7outhn5ku04ih@4ax.com> <MPG.30d4ca67abad814f9896d6@eu.news.astraweb.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
X-Complaints-To: abuse@n-o-s-p-a-m.pureusenet.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 20:43:11 UTC
Organization: Pure Usenet - Usenet for everyone
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:43:12 -0600
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4204318331
X-Received-Bytes: 1650
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.spiderhacker:73
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:56:57 -0500, Batman <TheB@t.cave> wrote:
>In article <3chl6b55efd8t5vdu2ldl7outhn5ku04ih@4ax.com>,
>Friends@gotham.org says...
>>
>> Wasn't Last Virgins part
>> of LS and not the other LV you mention?
>
>Little Virgins photos bear the LS logo. Last Virgins photos do not. Both
>series have been posted.
>
Once again you are absolutely correct, and I should have checked my
collection before making my post. LV does indeed have the LS logo and
LAV does not. I can also confirm that LV is still available in the
group you mentioned. Thank you for setting me straight ; )
|
|